Anon vs. Scientology

[Dmitry]

Yeah, I'm really curious about the video, and what was that with the people in masks with signs of other(?) people?

[Eaglestrike]

Scientology is trying to find out who members of Anonymous are and "outing" them. That's basically what the signs and video are all about, showing the face of someone without a mask and a name/address if they have those too.

[Koga]

They are ID'ing People and making videos with the picture, phone, address, full name and posting it on youtube and then declaring Free Game upon the ID'd people.

[Maxxthepenguin]

So... they're fighting Anonymous with...terror?

So...Scientology is a Terrorist Cult?

Hmm

[Dmitry]

So were the people holding the signs $ciolons with masks on?

[Azkarin]

So were the people holding the signs $ciolons with masks on?

That's what I took from it.

[jmc]

Yeah, the internet has enabled an entirely new form of public assembly here.

Oh, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't one of the key messages among anon protestors to NOT break the law, do NOT incite violence, do NOT get arrested, as none of those things help the cause?

Another board that I go too mentioned how Anon is in the wrong here because of "Anonymous death threats" and bomb threats, which just kind of strikes me as confusing the group Anonymous, with actual anonymous death/bomb threats.

Also dont forget, if you get arrested your no longer "anon" because if your arrested, anyone can goto the police station and request a "Daily incident log" and will have your name as arrested.

[jmc]

"“Fair game” was canceled in 1968, more than 30 years ago"
-http://faq.scientology.org/page38b.htm

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...airgamexd6.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/user/pethyl12

Report the user and all the videos.
CoS trying to post under different names on YouTube.
Fucking douchbags.

I'm...a little shaky. That could've been me, hell still could be.

I do not want to be publicly declared as an SP by Scientology. I work in television production, ...it could ruin me. They've already tried to ID me twice, followed me once...

Fuck. It's one thing when it's a dude up in a window with a camcorder or a telephoto lens. It's another when they are putting camcorders right in your, specific, face.

If they do it again, just go upto the officers observing the protest and claim they are illegally using your picture without content, in public manner, in a attempt to harm you within the community.

[archibaldcrane]

If they do it again, just go upto the officers observing the protest and claim they are illegally using your picture without content, in public manner, in a attempt to harm you within the community.

They have the right to take video or pictures of me in a public area. The following of me that they did for the duration of one city block could hardly be defined as stalking. While it's possible to find a sympathetic officer, most would recognize that the actions aren't illegal and rightfully wouldn't do anything.

[jmc]

If they do it again, just go upto the officers observing the protest and claim they are illegally using your picture without content, in public manner, in a attempt to harm you within the community.

They have the right to take video or pictures of me in a public area. The following of me that they did for the duration of one city block could hardly be defined as stalking. While it's possible to find a sympathetic officer, most would recognize that the actions aren't illegal and rightfully wouldn't do anything.

Yes, they do have the right to take video/pictures of you in public. However, unless your a civil employee they dont have the right to post your picture on anytype of viewing material yet alone something with your address under it without your consent to do so.

[Maxxthepenguin]

If they do it again, just go upto the officers observing the protest and claim they are illegally using your picture without content, in public manner, in a attempt to harm you within the community.

They have the right to take video or pictures of me in a public area. The following of me that they did for the duration of one city block could hardly be defined as stalking. While it's possible to find a sympathetic officer, most would recognize that the actions aren't illegal and rightfully wouldn't do anything.

Yes, they do have the right to take video/pictures of you in public. However, unless your a civil employee they dont have the right to post your picture on anytype of viewing material yet alone something with your address under it without your consent to do so.

Holy shit

Britney Spears might just be able to become the richest person alive.

[jmc]

If they do it again, just go upto the officers observing the protest and claim they are illegally using your picture without content, in public manner, in a attempt to harm you within the community.

They have the right to take video or pictures of me in a public area. The following of me that they did for the duration of one city block could hardly be defined as stalking. While it's possible to find a sympathetic officer, most would recognize that the actions aren't illegal and rightfully wouldn't do anything.

Yes, they do have the right to take video/pictures of you in public. However, unless your a civil employee they dont have the right to post your picture on anytype of viewing material yet alone something with your address under it without your consent to do so.

Holy shit

Britney Spears might just be able to become the richest person alive.

Most celbrities have various deals in place for paparazzi/news angencies to cover various things about them, usually in the intent to cover the "good things" with the running risk of also catching the bad things as well.

Besides, when was the last time someone from the paparazzi or a professional media crew went around following someone with thier personal address?

I work with protestors here in boston, and have even been observing multiple protests including the anon/scientology protests, biolab protests etc..... and for biolab/biotech if someone had a poster/banner/flyer with someones personal information on it, and displaying it for public view it was taken from that protestor.

Maybe it all depends on the state, heh

[Azkarin]

If they do it again, just go upto the officers observing the protest and claim they are illegally using your picture without content, in public manner, in a attempt to harm you within the community.

They have the right to take video or pictures of me in a public area. The following of me that they did for the duration of one city block could hardly be defined as stalking. While it's possible to find a sympathetic officer, most would recognize that the actions aren't illegal and rightfully wouldn't do anything.

Yes, they do have the right to take video/pictures of you in public. However, unless your a civil employee they dont have the right to post your picture on anytype of viewing material yet alone something with your address under it without your consent to do so.

Holy shit

Britney Spears might just be able to become the richest person alive.

iirc she can't sue because she is a public figure (ie she relies on her public image for her well-being)

[Yuri-G]

If they do it again, just go upto the officers observing the protest and claim they are illegally using your picture without content, in public manner, in a attempt to harm you within the community.

They have the right to take video or pictures of me in a public area. The following of me that they did for the duration of one city block could hardly be defined as stalking. While it's possible to find a sympathetic officer, most would recognize that the actions aren't illegal and rightfully wouldn't do anything.

Yes, they do have the right to take video/pictures of you in public. However, unless your a civil employee they dont have the right to post your picture on anytype of viewing material yet alone something with your address under it without your consent to do so.

Holy shit

Britney Spears might just be able to become the richest person alive.

iirc she can't sue because she is a public figure (ie she relies on her public image for her well-being)

bingo

[Deftscythe]

Sci-guy's youtube account got suspended.

[Warudo Ecksu]

I started on Alexander with a guy I played PSO with named Dethsythe. R u da same dude cuz if so WAY TO KEEP IN TOUCH.

if not then sorry loll

[Deftscythe]

No, sorry. My character on Alexander is named Leto.

[Koul]

http://www.thinkclearly.org/test/index.html

I like how no matter what you're screwed

[Parshias]

http://www.thinkclearly.org/test/index.html

I like how no matter what you're screwed

Nope! If you answer 8-10 of those questions yes... then you're probably like Jesus or something.

[Remyo]

http://www.thinkclearly.org/test/index.html

I like how no matter what you're screwed

Nope! If you answer 8-10 of those questions yes... then you're probably like Jesus or something.

does Jesus feel fatigued now and then for no apparent reason, does Jesus have drug flashbacks, does Jesus feel less alert than he used too, does Jesus feel lightheaded, does Jesus feel irritable without reason? I don't think you understand the questionnaire.