And Bin Laden is in Pakistan, you want to invade there too? Our armed forces are a bit busy, and our budget is a bit fucked, thanks to our jolly adventure in Iraq.Originally Posted by Egon
And Bin Laden is in Pakistan, you want to invade there too? Our armed forces are a bit busy, and our budget is a bit fucked, thanks to our jolly adventure in Iraq.Originally Posted by Egon
o rly?Originally Posted by senoska
http://imagecache2.allposters.com/im...-B-Posters.jpg
Here's a solution to Americans getting killed in Iraq.Originally Posted by Egon
Stay the fuck out of Iraq.
And there's weapons from America killing Americans in AfghanistanOriginally Posted by Egon
Matt Damon.Originally Posted by Jeryhn
But seriously. We don't have the man power to go on these invasions, and we're doomed to a horrible recession. Our economy is in the shitter, we need to fix problems home, before we fix shit down the road.
Exactly. And cutting federal funding for all levels of education is not the way to go. Nor is cutting NIH grants...Originally Posted by HAcoreRD
![]()
There are weapons from America that are killing Americans in Iraq.Originally Posted by Egon
What now?
Tonko, I think you swept the leg.Originally Posted by Tonko
And American weapons in Israel killing Palestinians.
Let's not even get into South America.
Or Africa while we're at it.Originally Posted by Beckwin
The only interest America has had in Africa since slavery has been a source of animals to fill our zoos with, silly.Originally Posted by -Omni
So? Making bad decisions in the past doesn't mean we need to just accept Iran selling/giving weapons to insurgents.Originally Posted by Unklemonkey
If they want to send weapons to our enemies I see no reason why we shouldn't find and destroy the facilities producing such weapons, even if they are located in Iran. If Bush and co. took a similar stance to Iraq and just bombed any suspected weapon facility we'd be set right now... I mean the only reason Iraq is a shit-storm is because we're out of our element. We're not a police, we're an army. If you want some shit blown up we can do it without even being detected on radar, but if you want to clear a city without destroying all of it's infrastructure that's a whole new ballgame.
Yeah, totally set. If we'd only bombed weapons factories that produced weapons used to kill Americans, we would've bombed...nothing at all!Originally Posted by Enkidu
A great plan in hindsight.
Tax cut would be a start, next would be reduce spending on the war(s), but neither will happenOriginally Posted by CMMeast
If you justify an attack on Iran based on them supplying weapons to a pre-existing enemy of ours (in this case, people we attacked), then you just also kinda justified... yeah.
if we just made an arabic wow we could prevent all of their children from becoming extremists because they would never leave their house
This is quite possibly the best solution I've ever heard.Originally Posted by Zalius
Hell we could even make a game about being an extremist.
We can also justify an attack based on them achieving Nuclear capabilities since they refuse to stop. If they do end up completing a nuclear warhead, it's possible that they could pass it to terrorist groups (that make it clear that they are enemies of the US) that would attack us with that power had they been given the chance.Originally Posted by Beckwin
We are kinda 0-for the century at judging countries WMD capabilities. plus I think you're whooshing Beckwin's pointOriginally Posted by Lee
I know that the Iraq-case has lost US Intelligence credibility on the matters of WMD. But Iran is a different situation entirely, they openly state that they are producing Nuclear Fuel and they have operational reactors. With nuclear-armed countries around Iran (Pakistan, India, Israel). What's stopping them from arming themselves if they have working reactors?Originally Posted by archibaldcrane
Edit: Also. Whooshing...? Sorry.![]()