Good answer.Originally Posted by Creeps
![]()
Good answer.Originally Posted by Creeps
![]()
http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/2008/POLITICS...ium.afp.gi.jpg
Man, his wife looked high as shit and he looks really creepy. Like a Mars Attacks alien.
cuz crack helps you keep legible notesOriginally Posted by archibaldcrane
This kind of sex scandal is pretty much an entry level requirement for a British politician.
If he'd managed to involve bondage, auto-asphyxiation and some same-sex for good measure, he'd be a natural cabinet minister.
http://wonkette.com/366083/a-pictorial- ... lub-ladies
Theres what he paid for.
That's gold. :DHa ha, Alana and Camila only get three Whore Diamonds, those silly whores.
So basicaly you pay to have sex with Victoria's Secrets models? I suppose for some this could be worth the money.Originally Posted by Dezzimal
btw:
LOLFor $5,500 an hour, the clock better start on penetration and end in a mind blowing orgasm. What the whore does for the next 59 minutes is up to her.
Can't be true... if it is then I foresee a mass resignation of cops.Originally Posted by SwampdonkeyPLD
lol you are all such hypocrites its disgusting
What? Are we politicians who made our careers by publicly humiliating people over bullshit and being completely focused on 'law and order' while doing something that is strictly illegal?Originally Posted by Demosthenes11
Fill in the blanks Demos:
If this was a _____ instead, you'd all be saying _____!
I think the lack of noise is the acknowledgment that no one here gets all that worked up about ridiculously-high-paying prostitution.
The guy's a retard, he's getting his comeuppance publicly and thoroughly, there's not much else to do here but crack jokes.
the only thing that makes this not a big deal is (D) and you know it
Republicans don't even have to break the law anymore to be publicly executed
It's not like the guy is now saying "I shouldn't be held to the same standards as your ordinary citizen, these charges are an outrage, I'm faithful to my wife" etc. etc.
He's getting completely owned - what should we be doing? Piling on?
Piling on? Like this?
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=22776&p=694061&hilit=craig#p69 4061
Wait but I thought Larry Craig was innocent of soliciting gay sex!
The key difference is that he was trying to deny everything, saying he's not gay, wasn't soliciting gay sex in a public bathroom, etc. etc.Originally Posted by Demosthenes11
If he'd owned up to it the piling on wouldn't have really happened, like in this case.
I get your sensitivity to the (D) vs. (R) matters, but you're missing the mark here.
(also, this thread is already longer than that one, and that thread even featured a little bit of tonko sticking up for that guy, kinda)
meh, the overall attitude and talk about them are just completely opposite and different
two be honest, i couldnt care less about either of them, i just find the current situation funny
David VitterOriginally Posted by Demosthenes11
Nuff said.
You're missing a key ingrediant in that there bowl of rofl.Originally Posted by Demosthenes11
Republican+gay sex= LOL
Am I missing something here? Everyone's responding like he just got caught buying a hooker or something, that's not it at all.
He was involved, i.e. some form of pimp's pimp or something, as in organized crime, not going out and buying a hooker.