New COR Rolls

[Ferien]

Yeah I was actually going w/ Cure II for that reason, possibly Cure III if I decide I want to use Evoker's instead of just bombing out my MP and resting. This is going to take a long friggin time, I don't see any faster way of doing it either.

Using Evoker's as you're casting has the potential to screw up your results, since the Refresh tick will occasionally coincide with the completion of a cast.

[Kylen]

[quote:2knbs2bw]Yeah I was actually going w/ Cure II for that reason, possibly Cure III if I decide I want to use Evoker's instead of just bombing out my MP and resting. This is going to take a long friggin time, I don't see any faster way of doing it either.

Using Evoker's as you're casting has the potential to screw up your results, since the Refresh tick will occasionally coincide with the completion of a cast.[/quote:2knbs2bw]
Yeah, I'd recommend just doing these tests next to a Nomad Moogle somewhere so you can change subjob and back again to quickly refill your mp bar instead of using Evoker's Roll.

[Callisto]

Yeah I was actually going w/ Cure II for that reason, possibly Cure III if I decide I want to use Evoker's instead of just bombing out my MP and resting. This is going to take a long friggin time, I don't see any faster way of doing it either.

Using Evoker's as you're casting has the potential to screw up your results, since the Refresh tick will occasionally coincide with the completion of a cast.

Yeah that's why I was iffy about it without using a spell that had high enough MP cost that you couldn't mistake a proc w/ a refresh tick. I'll just stick to Scholar's + Healer's to cut downtime and use Cure II.

[Delekii]

Dancer roll sucks for the same reason Paeon sucks, only moreso.