Do I dare ask about the Holocaust?

[Pirian]

Nazi Germany Holocaust survivors.

Holocaust Survivor doesn't mean they were in Auschwitz or anywhere near a death camp, or if they even seen a nazi soldier. Let's keep that in mind there, chief.

You do realize there were other death camps other than Auschwitz...right? Because the more you post the more it seems like you don't know anything about what you're talking about, but rather you see someones arguement, go look up a counterpoint on google, post and repeat.

[Creeps]

lol @ the idea of someone being scared of the French

[SwampdonkeyPLD]

Did you just liken George W. Bush to Winston Churchill?

Hell no lol.

Thank God, I was booking a flight. What did you mean when you mentioned a parallel with today?

This is a bit extreme, but it's no secret Iran supports terrorists. (Iran has biological weapons, that's no secret. But they have not shared them with terrorists. That's why I think is a bit extreme.) But I do wonder 10 years from now if Iran gets a nuclear weapon, what would happen. If nothing then great, I would rather be wrong than right. But if some war breaks, the U.S. could go in and stop them right now. I don't mean invade, but bomb the hell out of their facilities.

What? You mean France could have retaliated, defeated Germany, and overthrown its government in response to the invasion (even though they were eventually occuped)? Or would the German people have revolted against the Nazis if they hadn't generated continuous victories? Nothing could have realistically "removed the Nazis from power" at that point.

Yes, they could have overthrown Germany. That's one of the tragedies of the war. France ALONE could have stopped Hitler at that point, hence the reason Hitler gave that order to his Generals. And this is another debate, but I think the biggest reason France was eventually occupied is because they invested their entire national defence into the Majono(sp) line.

[thestalkmore]

What the hell Firas, what the hell. Why do you make these threads? Are you seeking attention, or just trying to start fights?

Can people honestly still deny that this shit took place? You have to be seriously insane.

why you pissed off? damn, im not an attention seeker, trust me...
apparently lots of people deny that "shit" took place.

I'm sorry but when you post shit like this, yes, you are an attention whore. (Or incredibly stupid)

You're free to believe whatever religion you want, but when shit is documented on video, pictures, and countless stories by survivors and such, you don't get to just deny it.

As far as a lot of people deny it, I'm going to go ahead and say it since nobody else will, the people that deny it are muslims, thats about it. The same ones that call for the destruction of Israel and all jews.
That site to me seems like a joke, or some crazy extremist(yes we have them to, they are a very small majority of the country, you can't take their opinion and assume that is everyones lol)

oh only the muslims dont believe in the holocaust? First, scroll up and read the sites name. Second, most of the historians that try to discredit the holocaust are non-muslims, and you call me stupid, haha. I'm not accusing, I'm asking, is it early for you to be civil? you know about 80% of the threads here i find stupid, and i find them a waste, you dont see me going posting in every one of them, saying "Well if you're going to post shit like this, you're probably an anttention whore" and call people stupid if they didn't know a certain issue in history.

why cant you be like Elphaba?

Sorry for quoting something from the first page but I don't think I have the patience to read through this entire thread like I did with the Denmark one. It was all I could do to not call you out in that thread and I didn't only because I didn't feel like being obligated to bang my head against the brick wall that is your awe inspiring stupidity for a few pages. Now however, it must be said: Firas, you may be the most idiotic fucking person who has ever graced the BlueGartr forums.

Edit: Ok I went back. You may be a little behind guartz.

[Shuemue]

but bomb the hell out of their facilities.

Not a great idea imo, alienating even more Muslim countries will just drag people like Pakistan further into it, and we know for a fact they have nukes. It's time to, yanno, talk.

[Mizango]

lol @ the idea of someone being scared of the French

lol Damn.

[Shuemue]

lol @ the idea of someone being scared of the French

lol Damn.

Last good French army was in 1066.

[SwampdonkeyPLD]

but bomb the hell out of their facilities.

Not a great idea imo, alienating even more Muslim countries will just drag people like Pakistan further into it, and we know for a fact they have nukes. It's time to, yanno, talk.

Agreed. But if the talks don't work, and something else could have been done to stop it...this is just really an extreme hypothetical though. I don't give it much merit.

[Howard Roark]

all i remember is the black and white footage of skeletal human bodies being BULL-DOZED into a mass grave

deny that, thread over

[Ryko]

Photoshopped

[guartz]

You can even go further back, into WW1.

When the U.S under Wilson enter ww1, they forced germany to accept unconditional surrender. And this is after wilson promised "I will not send your sons to fight foreign wars on foreign soil"

If u.s had not interfered, the ww1 would have ended with what's called "mutual exahustion" and quite possibly bismarck would have been overthrown by socialists, which would have failed like russia.. in other words, less bloodshed.

[Pirian]

You can even go further back, into WW1.

When the U.S under Wilson enter ww1, they forced germany to accept unconditional surrender. And this is after wilson promised "I will not send your sons to fight foreign wars on foreign soil"

If u.s had not interfered, the ww1 would have ended with what's called "mutual exahustion" and quite possibly bismarck would have been overthrown by socialists, which would have failed like russia.. in other words, less bloodshed.

Because Russia is in such a great position right now, correct? Go google that and get back to me

[Kuya]

lol @ the idea of someone being scared of the French

lol Damn.

Last good French army was in 1066.

What's with the US/France hating anyway?

[Shuemue]

lol @ the idea of someone being scared of the French

lol Damn.

Last good French army was in 1066.

What's with the US/France hating anyway?

I'm English. I'm entitled to hate France.
I'm English. I'm entitled to hate America (although I don't).

[guartz]

Because Russia is in such a great position right now, correct? Go google that and get back to me

I was just in Moscow too! You know, visiting the place of birth.

Hey, U.S is in awesome shape, ain't it? Try googling it, and tell me how the hell any of that is relavent.

[Remyo]

lol @ the idea of someone being scared of the French

lol Damn.

Last good French army was in 1066.

what about napoleons armies?

[Octavious]

I thought is was the popular thing to hate the French? I mean they take something like pancakes and make some girly name for it...wtf Crepe??? ITS A GOD DA...calm down...

iirc, I thought Russia had recently made steps towards some sort of free government system however it escapes me if it was something I saw on CNN or some bullshit in USA Today.

[Shuemue]

lol @ the idea of someone being scared of the French

lol Damn.

Last good French army was in 1066.

what about napoleons armies?

'sup

http://im.edirectory.co.uk/p/1196/r/wm2.jpg

[Tristam]

You can even go further back, into WW1.

When the U.S under Wilson enter ww1, they forced germany to accept unconditional surrender. And this is after wilson promised "I will not send your sons to fight foreign wars on foreign soil"

If u.s had not interfered, the ww1 would have ended with what's called "mutual exahustion" and quite possibly bismarck would have been overthrown by socialists, which would have failed like russia.. in other words, less bloodshed.

This morning in history -101 at Guartz University: What "would have" happened "quite possibly" if the scenario I made up actually happened.

Bring liquor to class.

[sephir]

You can even go further back, into WW1.

When the U.S under Wilson enter ww1, they forced germany to accept unconditional surrender. And this is after wilson promised "I will not send your sons to fight foreign wars on foreign soil"

If u.s had not interfered, the ww1 would have ended with what's called "mutual exahustion" and quite possibly bismarck would have been overthrown by socialists, which would have failed like russia.. in other words, less bloodshed.

Because Russia is in such a great position right now, correct? Go google that and get back to me

I dont know about that. Russia is doing good and bad at the same time, the revunues from oil is causing Moscow to be the city with the most millionaires per person, so there is a good deal of wealth coming into that country however with Putin and that whole "is he a dictator?" thing its difficult to tell whether Russia is doing good or bad right now. Id put it on parrallel to China right now, it has a promising future but there are many serious problems in its government.