Deejay, just because you consider yourself respectful around gays, doesn't make you actually respectful around gays.
Punch one in the face.Originally Posted by Deejay
Deejay, just because you consider yourself respectful around gays, doesn't make you actually respectful around gays.
Punch one in the face.Originally Posted by Deejay
It was a defense mechanism. Most kids respond to taunting my agreeing or pretending it is not occuring, look at Tonko's example. i mean duh, he was fucking provoked. I've blown air kisses to people on the court and on the bench when I played basketball in high school simply because they would get pissed and it threw them out of their game. Had they taken that wrong I should be shot too?
I mean I dont even see why this debate is even going on, it is like "He shouldn't have said he liked them olll!1" Nah fuck that, because had the little instigating fucktards minded their fucking business from the get go and just lived and let live then his dumb ass wouldn't be facing murder charges.
Call me cold and callous, but I have no pity for someone who does something out of sheer hate. I feel bad for his family for losing a son to the prison system. The school should also be held accountable for even allowing that environment to exist.
Someone who considers themselves respectful around gay people =/= Someone who is respectful. A closeted homophobe isn't necessarily less disdainful towards homosexuals as an open homophobe.Originally Posted by Deejay
There are plenty of homophobes in the world who don't go around shooting people in the head, even when provoked.Originally Posted by Deejay
Giving you an example of someone enforcing their stereotype? How about Rosa Parks, stubbornly remaining in that front seat - especially after being told to go sit in the back where she belonged? Sure, she got thrown in the slammer because of it, but I don't see any segregated buses around anymore, either.
I'm failing to see where the kid was scared in the story. Point me to the excerpt, because other than assumptions that a 15 year old gay kid has to be scared and cannot possibly be in a steady frame of mind, the story suggests the opposite.Originally Posted by EternityEnd
So you're saying that it's right to assume that open homophobes are less likely to be violent than closet ones?Originally Posted by EternityEnd
That's like saying white people who dislike to walk on the same side of the street as black people are more apt to punch one in the face (given the opportunity) more-so than someone in the KKK.
What Rosa Parks being stubborn because she was black? Or because she was tired?Originally Posted by Lexa
Rosa Parks wasn't enforcing any stereotypes by refusing to get up. She wasn't acting "more" black by saying simply saying "no." She just refused to adhere to an obviously dumb rule. The situation isn't the same here.
Gay men hitting on men is enforcing a negative stereotype?Originally Posted by Deejay
In your friend's case, I am correct, assuming your friends aren't 'openly' hateful towards gays. See, because punching someone in the face isn't not-homophobic.Someone who considers themselves respectful around gay people =/= Someone who is respectful. A closeted homophobe isn't necessarily less disdainful towards homosexuals as an open homophobe.
This i think sums up your entire position, and its flawed in that you just don't know that to be true. You are making an assumption, one that not everyone agrees with. It is not a fact, and making 27 more posts in this thread won't make it any more than an assumption on your part.Originally Posted by Deejay
No, hitting on the men who are negatively stereotyping you is enforcing said stereotype.Originally Posted by Kuya
For example, you walk up to me and say "hey blackie, quit being lazy and go support your family."
Does it make sense to respond by actually being lazy and not supporting my family?
Is that helping or negating your image of me?
I had a friend who had a 50 year old man hit on him at work. Did he punch him in the face? No, instead he was a civilized human being about it. He just said "Nah man, I'm not that way." and was pretty chill about it. How come other people feel the need to be hostile about it? Oh noez, ur masculinity has been hurtzed. Says who? Something offends you only if you allow it too. Get off your ego trip and get over yourself.
(Aimed towards people who react as said.)
Also, to be homophobic, you are afraid of homosexuals. People who become hostile towards gay people, or just people in general, are not phobics. They are just assholes.
She was most definitely making a bad situation worse, by refusing to get up and move. You say she was refusing to adhere to a "dumb rule." The only difference between that situation and this, was that that time's discrimination was written down as law, while today's is (mostly) unwritten prejudice bullshit.Originally Posted by Deejay
As for other examples, I could tell you a personal story, but you'd probably just call bullshit on the account that you don't know me, don't know my life, don't know what's going on in every single corner of the world, you only know the bad cases that's being reported in the news - oh, wait, I guess that IS my point!
So I guess being realistic is "assuming"?Originally Posted by Stumblingdrunk
Suppose you were a black person:
WHICH ONE OF THESE PEOPLE WOULD YOU RATHER SEE IF YOU NEEDED A HAND OUT OF A BURNING BUILDING?
http://www.lekkerverhaal.nl/weblog/w...1125593842.jpg
OR
http://samizdat.typepad.com/notes/randall-thumb.jpg
Seriously.
I don't think I'd be thinking about what hand was saving me, but rather thinking something along the lines of OMG THIS BUILDING IS ON FIRE GET ME THE FUCK OUT HLAP HLAP HLAP!
And Larry was making a bad situation worse by hitting on a homophobe. I'm not saying he deserved to die, but if he wanted to ultimately diffuse the situation and be allowed to live his life, hitting on a homophobe isn't going to do it.Originally Posted by Lexa
Edit: It's just going to make the homophobe hate him more. Why respond to hateful people by giving them more of a reason to hate you? What does that do but add fuel to the fire?
Worked for Rosa Parks.Originally Posted by Deejay
Hell, for that matter, it worked for me.
Rosa Parks' reaction wasn't to act more black. Why do you keep bringing her up lol
Because you just admitted ithey were both making a bad situation worse. You asked for an example, I gave one. Don't be offended because I poked holes in your flawed logic and beliefs that everyone is entitled to live their own life, as long as they do it quietly and subdued and just let the haters go about their business.Originally Posted by Deejay
I said, give me a situation where acting out a stereotype will make a person not stereotype you anymore. You're even saying so in this post.Originally Posted by Lexa
"as long as they do it quietly and subdued and just let the haters go about their business."
Is hitting on homophobes "doing it quietly and subdued?" Or further cementing their hate for gays?
Edit: And I never said they had to live in a secret village, i'm saying that enforcing a negative stereotype doesn't solve anything.