With a corresponding largest decrease of the federal budget deficit in American History.Originally Posted by SwampdonkeyPLD
I can live with that.
With a corresponding largest decrease of the federal budget deficit in American History.Originally Posted by SwampdonkeyPLD
I can live with that.
Operation Chaos ftw
Two internets to the person who figures out what i'm talking about.
Not when you have universal health care you won't have a decrease in the federal budget deficit.Originally Posted by Correction
Clinton's 0/1 on getting such legislation passed from the time she already spend getting all that 'experience' in the White House. I'm hoping she'll continue that streak. Not like I'm voting for the bitch anyway.Originally Posted by SwampdonkeyPLD
But one thing at a time, let's do something about the fact that we have a 240 billion dollar annual shortfall on the budget, most of which is increased defense spending and a tax cut we couldn't afford in the first place.
Reaganomics. LOL
wait, what?Originally Posted by Ryushii
Agreed, however I don't think it should be done by raising taxes on working class/poor people. Start eliminating stupid government bullshit. Here's one example. My congressman David Price had electronic bus schedules installed at 17 bus stops. Each one cost 1 mill a piece (Fed payed 800k state payed 200k) He could have just printed up some flyer's and posted them there for hella cheaper. I wonder how much more bullshit like that there is?Originally Posted by Correction
I found 3.8 billion for submarine research when our only active wars are in landlocked countries.
http://lieberman.senate.gov/newsroom/re ... ?id=275124
Doesn't take much searching to find it all. It's just a matter of not electing pinheads like lieberman into office over and over again. But don't get me started on incumbency in Congress and 'safe' district redraws every time they're up.
At least we agree there's better ways to do it I guess.
Logical reasoning does not necessarily mean correct spelling, that would be grammatically correct reasoning.Originally Posted by senoska
I think the true irony is that he himself offered no informed opinions or logical reasoning behind his (implied) dislike of Obama.Originally Posted by Lordwafik
Submarines do carry nuclear missiles and thats been their only use since the cold war basically. Not taking one side or the other but they can easily hit a land locked country with a missile fired from a submarine; not to mention submarines are much harder to detect than airplanes.
I didn't even notice the spelling error until you pointed it out.Originally Posted by Lordwafik
edit: osup page 2
this is what I was implying.Originally Posted by Correction
I wouldn't say it's ironic as he wasn't really offering an argument, but instead a statement that was stating a behavioural pattern that he has noticed. The next step in this process is for a reader to bite, and him to come back with the argumentOriginally Posted by Correction
lolOriginally Posted by senoska
Menopause?Originally Posted by Lordwafik
No, he was offering his opinion, his earlier point didn't have anything to do with arguments or anything of the nature, he was talking about uninformed opinions, and then the next sentence (which was extremely biased and had the intellectual level of a fox news propagandist, even without the spelling error.) committed exactly what he accused the other party of. It was baseless.Originally Posted by Lordwafik
How ever wafik, you're correct, it wasn't ironic. It's not ironic for a moron to act like a moron, it's just the way it works.
Originally Posted by senoska
The base is in the fact that there are a huge number of people that hate Hillary based purely on the fact that she was comically portrayed as a feminazi nut job whose husband the president was just her bitch during a large part of Bill's term.
There's also that whole "zomg Hillary said lulz lets gets to teh nukin on Iran" thread a few posts down.
Thank you for understanding my point.Originally Posted by Plow
To the guy who is trying to discount my opinion, please feel free to explain to me how "Whereas the people that don't like Obama (note the phrasing) tend to have logical reasoning behidn their opinions," is anything but an overdramatization of trends I have noticed in my political discussions with other people, and instead an "extremely biased" "uninformed opinion." And before you try and say that I think all Obama supporters are sexist ignorants, understand the idea of a generalized statement. I have met many intelligent Obama supporters with opinions that, while I disagree with, have valid points that I can respect.
Further note: continue to point out that I hit my keys wrong, and instead of typing behind switched the "n" and "d" to make behidn. If you think that makes me a moron, then you obviously have the debating skills of a pre-schooler. The only thing it makes me is someone who needs to look over what he posts for mistypes.
Something tells me you've never seen the website HillaryIs44.com, or DailyKos for that matter. Take a look at those two websites and re-evaluate your statement.Originally Posted by Ryushii
The reality is there's logical reasoning in support of both candidates, and there's haters against both candidates. It's a lot more pronounced in this election cycle because the race is so damn close.
Can the black guy win already, so we can re-name the country the United States of Funk?