Makes sense to me.Because ghosts tend to haunt in the dark and it's hard to see in the dark, so they stumble around and occasionally run into books and chairs. Then they moan when they stub their toe.
Makes sense to me.Because ghosts tend to haunt in the dark and it's hard to see in the dark, so they stumble around and occasionally run into books and chairs. Then they moan when they stub their toe.
Gravity is proof of ghosts. Jesus told me so.Originally Posted by Day
Wait, wrong thread.
That clears up a lot of questions, but how come they don't just pass through those objects?Originally Posted by Khamsin
But can Jesus tell us if the cat is dead or alive?
I bet some people were expecting me to talk about cinnamon toast crunch.
Schrödinger's cat is Jesus. And damn straight he know why the little runts love Cinnamon Toast Crunch.
Because ghosts become solid in the dark.Originally Posted by Blarg
In dim light, they're just solid enough to move a chair while passing through it.
I've met a lot of people that believe in ghosts.
I've never met a single person that believed in ghosts and didn't really WANT to believe in ghosts because they liked the idea. Some people really want some notion of supernatural- they find that it fills a need within them (for any number of reasons). As such, they will always interpret anything that is not immediately explainable by normal means to be supernatural- that cold draft couldn't be bad sealant, it must be a ghost. That light flickering can't be horrible wiring, it's a ghost. That book is floating because of a ghost not a hoax.
Do you believe in ghosts? Or are you TRYING to believe in ghosts? There is a difference.
I think some people like to think they know something, some higher truth, that others don't. Kinda how conspiracy theories are popular, it feels good to think you know what is really going on.Originally Posted by Nystul
Originally Posted by Blarg
Yea, perhaps. What I'm more getting at though is how you can either see compelling evidence of something, consider it objectively, then make a decision on the balance of all information out there, OR you can make your decision first, then pick out compelling evidence that supports it. I've never met a person that believes strongly in ghosts to arrive at their belief through the first method.
Im not a religious person, but I like the "idea" of ghosts and reading about hauntings. I havent quite worked out the who or why's about it, but I think its fascinating!
Think of it in terms of religion. There's a lot of people who don't believe in religion because it makes them feel better. There's plenty of people who would really rather their religion didn't exist, and that the things they teach weren't true, because their religion scares them and it would make them feel better to believe it were all lies... but they believe anyway.
Think of religions that advocate human sacrifice, or grueling rituals or unpleasant lifestyle changes, or promises of a fiery hell in the afterlife and an eternity of torture. I'm sure there are some true believers out there who think their god is a real dick, don't agree with the values taught by the religion, and are afraid of the torment promised them without letting it control their rational thinking (i.e. don't allow the church to control them with fear, while still believing and being afraid).
Why they believe, I don't know, but they have their reasons for believing in something that they don't want to believe in and does not make them feel better, and does not manipulate their lifestyles through fear (though it tries).