Well have you tried it yet?Originally Posted by Kuya
Well have you tried it yet?Originally Posted by Kuya
I don't need to drive into a tornado to know it's dangerous.Originally Posted by Blarg
Fewer people die from driving into tornadoes than anything else. Sounds pretty safe to me.Originally Posted by Kuya
But doesn't that mean that more people are killed by their spouses than from driving into tornadoes? So if he thinks that driving into a tornado is dangerous, why would he want to do something even more dangerous?!Originally Posted by Blarg
Hmmmmm. Well he incorrectly thinks driving into tornadoes is dangerous so even things more dangerous could still be pretty safe. Also, I think Kuya is in pretty good shape so he would probably be the one doing the spouse killing, it would also be a race crime to kill Kuya so his spouse would like to avoid even trying to kill him.
Be reasonable, now. There are plenty of dangerous things that haven't killed anyone yet. Black holes for instance.
Normally i despise neo, but in this case, touche.Originally Posted by Neosutra
I really hope that you were being sarcastic about religion not controlling the government, because if not, you have issues.
you gotta be shitting bricks if you think that's true... but then again, as you say, doesn't mean it's controlling our govt.Originally Posted by Vail
![]()
![]()
It's jew bankers that control the gov not religion idiots.
No one would say they control the government. We were saying they have a very large influence on political decisions that effect government actions due to pandering of their religious values.
I don't know about you guys but I only vote for people who agree with my stance on abortion, stem cell research, and gay marriage.
Or at least say they do, regardless of wether they themselves are infact gay stem cell researchers who have had abortions.Originally Posted by Blarg
I don't, stealing candy from anyone else just isn't as fun.Originally Posted by Raineer
Candy is CandyOriginally Posted by RKenshin
![]()
So, what exactly gives our government the authority to issue marriage licenses anyway?
uh there aren't federal marriage licenses, just state ones and states have adopted a policy to universally recognize the licenses of all other states.
*insert that bit of the ol' constitution about powers left to the states*
chill dude, no one is oppressing you or stealing your money on this.
I understand that, but why do we allow our state government the authority to tell us who can and who can't get married? I understand why we have drivers licenses: you can kill people if you're operating a car and don't understand how to drive or what the laws are. What's the worst that'll happen if we take away marriage licenses?Originally Posted by Beckwin
we allow it because our elected representatives put it in state constitutions?
Religious reasons?I understand that, but why do we allow our state government the authority to tell us who can and who can't get married?
They get really really butthurt.What's the worst that'll happen if we take away marriage licenses?
I've grew up around a lot of failed marriages. And even in the media, all we hear about are celebrity marriages which will eventually fail. I wonder how common that is. Maybe that's why people don't like marriage. Chile prohibits divorce which made things interesting.