Item Search
     
BG-Wiki Search
Page 63 of 144 FirstFirst ... 13 53 61 62 63 64 65 73 113 ... LastLast
Results 1241 to 1260 of 2863
  1. #1241
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    9,727
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    That's like the best staff for rdm @_________________________________________@.

  2. #1242
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10,115
    BG Level
    9

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Indeed, good shit, gotta take sum pics.

  3. #1243
    Member of Nikkei's Harem
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    455
    BG Level
    4
    FFXI Server
    Unicorn
    WoW Realm
    Deathwing

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Calling Dorje on hydra.

  4. #1244
    Old Merits
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,142
    BG Level
    6

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Sorry, but I have to disagree with that staff (M.acc +20, etc) being the best compared to HQ staves for RDM.

  5. #1245
    Puppetmaster
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    70
    BG Level
    2
    FFXIV Character
    Garion Vale
    FFXIV Server
    Excalibur
    FFXI Server
    Lakshmi

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Quote Originally Posted by chapstick
    Sorry, but I have to disagree with that staff (M.acc +20, etc) being the best compared to HQ staves for RDM.

    just depends on what you think about enfeebles, it has +10 mnd, makes the enfeebles more potent. Thats why ppl think its better.

  6. #1246
    Old Merits
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,142
    BG Level
    6

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Quote Originally Posted by Garion
    Quote Originally Posted by chapstick
    Sorry, but I have to disagree with that staff (M.acc +20, etc) being the best compared to HQ staves for RDM.

    just depends on what you think about enfeebles, it has +10 mnd, makes the enfeebles more potent. Thats why ppl think its better.
    Mythic +1 / Muse Tariqah beats it out on potency. :/

  7. #1247
    Sea Torques
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    617
    BG Level
    5

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Cerb/Khim drops 5 items so ... 1 more item from Hydra. It should be D44 Lv 75 BLU sword.

  8. #1248
    Yoshi P
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    5,360
    BG Level
    8
    WoW Realm
    Arthas

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Quote Originally Posted by Tricen
    That's like the best staff for rdm @_________________________________________@.
    For....what? The only use I can see is stacking mnd for enfeebles, but for things that matter you're better off sticking with an hq staff, and stacking mnd elsewhere. With ES, you're better off with wand + shield.

    Quote Originally Posted by eva00r
    Cerb/Khim drops 5 items so ... 1 more item from Hydra. It should be D44 Lv 75 BLU sword.
    That drops from lambton worm, check the sandworm thread.

  9. #1249
    New Spam Forum
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    165
    BG Level
    3

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Quote Originally Posted by chapstick
    Sorry, but I have to disagree with that staff (M.acc +20, etc) being the best compared to HQ staves for RDM.
    Good if you wanna be lazy and save some room -- i'm sure you could more than get by with this staff over the 6 HQs (save light and dark HQs). But i'm sure you could sell this for more than you could the 6HQ staves you'd replace it with at this moment (i'm sure i only saw a RA tag on it).

  10. #1250
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    9,727
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    HQ ele staves are +15MACC or +15% macc? The staff also has 10int/mnd which is another 5 acc with it, assuming 2:1.

  11. #1251
    Official THE Alpha and Omega
    Moderator

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    5,892
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Sometimes you want to land it AND have better potency!
    I'm guessing 20 Macc is pretty close to staves' Macc and the relevant stat DOES add to Macc as well as potency.

  12. #1252
    New Spam Forum
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    196
    BG Level
    3

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Quote Originally Posted by Tricen
    HQ ele staves are +15MACC or +15% macc? The staff also has 10int/mnd which is another 5 acc with it, assuming 2:1.
    Pretty sure it's +15%, since it's 15% damage, but that's just a guess.

  13. #1253
    Old Merits
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,142
    BG Level
    6

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Anything worth using staves on also will have alot of skill gear in the setup. +15% of ~330+ skill is > 20 macc. Not to mention that you still need to tote around HQ staves for nuking unless you just want to straight up gimp yourself.

    That staff is mediocre at best if you ask me.

  14. #1254
    Official THE Alpha and Omega
    Moderator

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    5,892
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Quote Originally Posted by chapstick
    Anything worth using staves on also will have alot of skill gear in the setup. +15% of ~330+ skill is > 20 macc.
    The only thing that adds a % to your acc stat is food. I don't see them deviating from that pattern for ele staves. I doubt that the staves add 50 macc. It just doesn't make sense and doesn't fit with what I have seen.

    Not to mention that you still need to tote around HQ staves for nuking unless you just want to straight up gimp yourself.

    That staff is mediocre at best if you ask me.
    RDM nuking luls. You'd still only want Aquilos and Jupiter for most RDM nuking, right?

  15. #1255
    Somewhere, someone is trying to hate me to death for my crusade of trying to convince everyone that AV is defeatable.
    (PS: Kill yourself)

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,033
    BG Level
    6

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Simple fact is no one knows for a fact how much magic acc HQ staves add, they assume it is +15% due to +15% dmg, however it could be far from that sorry to tell anyone who thinks that. You want to know how much it gives you would have to do extensive testing, which as far as I know... has not happened. So before you put out hate against a staff that could easily surpass HQ staff as far as potency + acc goes, go do tests, otherwize please don't say shit you think, but can't confirm for a fact.

    Note: in no way am I saying this WILL be better acc wize, just stating those of you who think you know the magic acc on HQ staves, think again plz.

  16. #1256
    Daddy Warbucks
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,371
    BG Level
    6

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Thinking either Nanatsuya or Shisui drop off Hydra, hoping it's the former .

  17. #1257
    Old Merits
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,142
    BG Level
    6

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Quote Originally Posted by Maxxthepenguin
    Not to mention that you still need to tote around HQ staves for nuking unless you just want to straight up gimp yourself.

    That staff is mediocre at best if you ask me.
    RDM nuking luls. You'd still only want Aquilos and Jupiter for most RDM nuking, right?
    luls at what? playing RDM to its full potential? Sure, mostly aquilo's and juipter's for the most part, but not all the time. I use Fire III often on my RDM because the other two aren't ready yet. Terra's for -physical damage taken, apollo's for curing, pluto's for resting. I seriously can't believe you think it replaces HQ staves (or staves in general, you still need to carry at least the NQ of the last few around).

  18. #1258
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,656
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Orson Dara
    FFXIV Server
    Cactuar
    FFXI Server
    Alexander

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Quote Originally Posted by Virtuous Saint
    Simple fact is no one knows for a fact how much magic acc HQ staves add, they assume it is +15% due to +15% dmg, however it could be far from that sorry to tell anyone who thinks that. You want to know how much it gives you would have to do extensive testing, which as far as I know... has not happened. So before you put out hate against a staff that could easily surpass HQ staff as far as potency + acc goes, go do tests, otherwize please don't say shit you think, but can't confirm for a fact.

    Note: in no way am I saying this WILL be better acc wize, just stating those of you who think you know the magic acc on HQ staves, think again plz.
    I could be wrong but I'm thinking Studio Ghibli(sp?) tested them a long time ago.

  19. #1259
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10,115
    BG Level
    9

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Quote Originally Posted by chapstick
    Mistilteinn / Muse Tariqah beats it out on potency. :/
    Fixed.

  20. #1260
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    9,727
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Re: New ToAU NMs (post findings here)

    Is it MATT+15% or MATT+15, or is tho no difference?

Page 63 of 144 FirstFirst ... 13 53 61 62 63 64 65 73 113 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Einherjar Tier 2 [Now with more bitching!]
    By Ryko in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 216
    Last Post: 2007-10-20, 15:31