DOCSIS 2.0? Nice try.Originally Posted by netz
Most cable providers are still running DOCSIS 1.1 because it's absurdly expensive to overhaul CPE.
You want to pay $500 for the new modem + truck roll + other associated costs? No? Neither do they.
That's why DOCSIS 2.0 has mostly been bypassed, and providers are betting the farm on 3.0. DOCSIS 2.0 was always a half measure to help stem the bleeding, and there's a lot more opportunity associated with 3.0. If there's going to be a migration, it might as well be to something much more scalable and potentially more profitable.
----
Movin' on, there really isn't any viable alternative to charging by the bandwidth in America. If you implement aggressive "network management" to control congestion, you end up in a media shitstorm and the FCC rather unhappy with you. If you implement no other controls, your infrastructure is horridly overtaxed and you lose customers to service outages and SLA violations.
The funny part is how much the public eye is focused on the evils of P2P, when it's not even the worst offender when it comes to bandwidth sucking. That crown's been solidly claimed by streaming video, and isn't going away any time soon.
If there's major technical limitations (e.g. the costs and limitations of 40G backhauls between SP POPs, and the cost of deploying more edge connectivity) constricting bandwidth, you'd better believe they're going to make those who want the most of it pay for it. Sucks for internet power users, but when something like 80% of internet traffic is generated by less than 10% of the total userbase, it's not exactly shocking that sooner or later the burden of paying for it all shifts.
p.s. I love YouTube, pretty much guarantees I'll have a job for the forseeable future. The need for core routing grows exponentially when more and more people steam video online, and core routing writes my paycheck.
XI Wiki


