Item Search
     
BG-Wiki Search
Page 13 of 82 FirstFirst ... 3 11 12 13 14 15 23 63 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 260 of 1638
  1. #241
    Nidhogg
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,793
    BG Level
    7

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    Quote Originally Posted by Toyotomi
    Well sure, for...non HNM events, a rdm can prolly take care of most things.... But when you're low manning enmity is usually a big issue, and cure 5 is your friend. I avoided cure 4 like the plague, and sch doesn't have as much -enmity gear as whm does. And in regards to the haste issue, I've always found it's the whm's responsibility to pick a tank and haste them. The rdm has enough to do. Just don't think you can replace whm with sch, if you think that's the case you're greatly underestimating a very capable job...if played right and properly equipped.
    The haste issue I was giving up as a loss, and it's a pretty small one. On whm, I generally tried to keep 2 tanks hasted, to allow the rdm to focus more on refresh, debuffs, phalanx2, etc. Yes, replacing a whm with a scholar will put a little bit extra load on the rdm to haste, but since the addition of /sch, the rdm can probably stop refreshing the whm/sch, or sch/x if needed, so adding 1 haste should net about the same.

    As for enmity, I fully understand how it works, and many whms I see in HNM shells have the same attitude as you being "omg cure4 is the devil". I think if a whm wants to be good, they should go read Kaeko's enmity shit first off, which will start off showing you that cure4 is good and useable, especially early on in a fight. Furthermore, I'm not sure if you realize, but putting stoneskin on the tank is very little hate in the long run, with a spike in VE when you cast it. It is actually, over a long fight, the most enmity-efficient way to "heal" the tank.

    All the following #s are credited to Kaeko:

    Stoneskin: 1CE, 300VE.
    Accession: 1CE, 80VE.
    Cure IV: .72CE, 4.32VE per hp cured.
    Cure V: 400CE, 700VE.

    What's this mean? If I Stoneskinga myself and the tank, I gain 2CE, and 680VE to prevent 350 dmg to the tank (not to mention if the tank's shadows fall, it gives him more leeway to not die in a bad situation). On top of that, it will lower the hate the tank loses due to absorbing 350 dmg. A good scholar should be able to keep this up most the times, especially if they are smart timing it between tp attacks/etc. You can also do it from outside 10' from the mob if you position properly, which is the radius on the shorter range aoes usually. Anyway, the clear benefits as far as hate goes are the fact the CE is insanely low, the VE is still half of what Cure IV would take to do the same amount, AND the tank suffers no blood loss on top of that.

    But move on to CureIV/CureV. If you ever land a Cure V for less than 555, you are actually generating more enmity with Cure V in the long run than you would have with Cure IV (more CE, VE early in the fight should decay if you are smart with it). This does happen, especially if you have multiple healers. Perhaps some shells are more amazing than the ones I've watched fight Cerberus and shit, but I definitely see Cure Vs land for 0, and wonder if the players even realize they just fucked themselves on threat.

    Then again, there's also people who still try to log for threat, and don't realize the only thing they are doing is losing VE from not doing anything for X amount of time. If you are smart and have an idea as to where your VE is at roughly, and try to have healers alternate cures, you can keep your VE at a very manageable lvl without ever using C5, and outside of 100% perfect play, your CE will be right around the same level.

  2. #242
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    9,727
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    Some of these I've found

  3. #243
    assburgers
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    10,925
    BG Level
    9

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    Sheesh, I already summed it up.

    /Sch gives the same kind of boost/tradeoff vs /Blm for Whm as /Sam gives to a 2her vs /Nin.

    A surefire safety net vs Doing everything your job does well, just a little better.

    People still don't consider Drk or Drg or Gaxe War gimpy without /Sam do they?

    They'll never consider Whm gimpy without /Sch then.

    It's still a kick ass sub for a wide range of situations. (sitchy-ay-shuns)

  4. #244
    Puppetmaster
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    72
    BG Level
    2

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    Quote Originally Posted by rog
    snipped
    My god, your UI is the most eye destroying one I have seen yet.

  5. #245
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,121
    BG Level
    6

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!


  6. #246
    Yoshi P
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,478
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Leviathan

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Mk. 2
    Another Khimaira camper?

    At least it's not as bad as Pent.

  7. #247
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,121
    BG Level
    6

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    yep <_< berek got his so c-team came out to camp (boasoul, juice, jag)

  8. #248
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,662
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Issah Grimes
    FFXIV Server
    Balmung
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!


  9. #249
    assburgers
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    10,925
    BG Level
    9

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    I think it slow the enemy I hit

  10. #250
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,121
    BG Level
    6

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    the slow is converted to haste i mean why else would SE put slow on gear lol!

  11. #251
    Sea Torques
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    519
    BG Level
    5
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    Quote Originally Posted by Tricen
    Some of these I've found
    Other than the rings/earrings/ammo/range.. both of those RDMs have better gear than me.(and I also have spider).

    What's gimp about them?

  12. #252
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,662
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Issah Grimes
    FFXIV Server
    Balmung
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    He also stood in front of its mouth and just as it was about to breath they killed it. Made us cry on vent.

  13. #253
    Sea Torques
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    690
    BG Level
    5
    FFXI Server
    Quetzalcoatl

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j6/Misuicide/yeah.jpg

    [spoiler:133o00xc]yes thats a pigeon earring[/spoiler:133o00xc]

    where do all the crappy aegis plds come from

  14. #254
    Sev
    Sev is offline
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,680
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Sevv Zero
    FFXIV Server
    Gilgamesh
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix
    WoW Realm
    Stonemaul

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    Quote Originally Posted by Misuicide
    http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j6/Misuicide/yeah.jpg

    [spoiler:2do2we0e]yes thats a pigeon earring[/spoiler:2do2we0e]

    where do all the crappy aegis plds come from
    Visa

  15. #255
    Salvage Bans
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    759
    BG Level
    5

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    Quote Originally Posted by Iremire
    I'm more suprised that your $3000 bot lost claim than see a gimp person with Infinity pearl. When we came to Phoenix we thought they are RMT because their equip and gear choices are just hilarious. You could kinda post the whole LS here. Mcu is only with them because he wants to get N.Legs, he didn't want to wait until we sell it to 2 other persons before we could sell to him.

  16. #256
    Chram
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,662
    BG Level
    7
    FFXIV Character
    Avelle Asteria
    FFXIV Server
    Hyperion
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix
    WoW Realm
    Alleria

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    Quote Originally Posted by Misuicide
    http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j6/Misuicide/yeah.jpg

    [spoiler:r0a5yvpx]yes thats a pigeon earring[/spoiler:r0a5yvpx]

    where do all the crappy aegis plds come from
    This guy is on Midgard? Oh for fuck sake.

  17. #257
    Nidhogg
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,565
    BG Level
    7
    FFXIV Character
    Amelia Diremii
    FFXIV Server
    Gilgamesh
    FFXI Server
    Cerberus

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Mk. 2
    yep <_< berek got his so c-team came out to camp (boasoul, juice, jag)
    You mean Berek remade an LS? Or is he still in KoN/Dynasty/WhateverTheirFuckingNameIsNow?

    I almost fucking choked at that paladin. Whattheshityo.

  18. #258
    S N K
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,664
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    Quote Originally Posted by FailureMidgard
    While there are still a few times /blm or /smn has uses, for the most part, white mages should be subbing scholar most all the time. I'd rather have a poorly geared whm/sch than a well geared whm/blm.
    You are not bitching about SCH as something that should be the only sub a WHM can use are you?

    Please tell me you're not serious...

    Warp is really good for killing shit, am I right?
    Yeah I suppose Elemental Seal Repose or Sleepga for a Bad pull that kills all the BLMs isn't a good idea either right? Just like Sath said there are times where I value a whm having that elemental seal for that rare instant of a fuckup which could wipe an ally.

    Now don't get me wrong in saying that /sch is a bad sub. I think it's a great sub to have but calling out 5 WHMs and saying they are gimp for not leveling /sch is foolish. The subs they have atm are perfectly ok in Dynamis for what they're doing which is standing there cure bombing people in their partys.

    Unless you can point out how well sch will make them cure better all the time, I don't see any real difference. I'm currently leveling sch to 37 for my whm which I finally picked back up after almost 2 years of not even touching it.

    I'm more of a completist tho when it comes to subs because I like having options. Those WHMs were perfectly fine in my eyes.

    I don't see /sch as a requirement but as a choice if they wanna do something new and fun.

  19. #259
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    4,753
    BG Level
    7

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    Did you read what you quoted? I mean, it says right there that he acknowledges that the alternate subjobs do have uses.

    And what are these "bad pulls" you're referring to?

  20. #260
    S N K
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,664
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    Re: The gimp/confused/wtf player thread IV: No NQ Amemets here!

    Quote Originally Posted by Tsuko_Asura
    Did you read what you quoted? I mean, it says right there that he acknowledges that the alternate subjobs do have uses.

    And what are these "bad pulls" you're referring to?
    <Thief>Oh shit...links...

Page 13 of 82 FirstFirst ... 3 11 12 13 14 15 23 63 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1465
    Last Post: 2010-05-22, 09:18
  2. Replies: 1496
    Last Post: 2009-01-22, 12:08
  3. Replies: 1491
    Last Post: 2008-11-18, 07:13
  4. Replies: 1491
    Last Post: 2008-09-11, 21:24
  5. The gimp/confused/wtf player thread: III
    By Epical in forum FFXI: Media
    Replies: 1459
    Last Post: 2008-06-16, 18:47
  6. The gimp/confused /wtf player thread: II
    By Sonomaa in forum FFXI: Media
    Replies: 1489
    Last Post: 2008-04-11, 00:37
  7. The slightly gimp / confused / wtf player thread
    By Division3 in forum FFXI: Media
    Replies: 3056
    Last Post: 2008-01-21, 14:04