Spoiler: show
Spoiler: show
I hated the way the gadgets were getting in the brosnan movies, I don't remember what they were like in the older vids though.
Speaking of crazy gadgets, does the scientist make an appearance showing Bond the different equipment and all sorts of accidents happen and hilarity ensues?
Well, we're going to see it right now, hope it doesn't suck as much...
Nah, Q or R aren't in the movie.
The video did one thing though.... It makes me wish I still had a N64 so I can play Goldeneye 007 again D:
I'd so buy a 360 or PS3 if Rare remade the game.
The first time Q pops up(From Russia with Love iirc) the gadgets are entirely realistic lol, they were more or less plausible in the Connery movies, as much as the banter with Q/R is cute I hated how it basically was like Q knows each predicament Bond will get into in the movie and gives him the perfect tool to react lol. Craig's Bond is largely operating outside of standard channels in these 2 movies so I can see why there is no Q since he hasn't had a need for Q or gadgetry. The crazy touch screens MI-6 has in this movie can be considered Q type stuff, but I also found interesting how they've changed the dynamic of MI-6 from the older Bonds and where did they get to calling M Mum when it stands for Minister >.>. Also, Q or no Q next movie, they better have Moneypenny.
I only noticed one guy doing that, but yeah... where did they come up with that? 0.ohere did they get to calling M Mum when it stands for Minister
I saw the movie today, loved it. The sold out theatre seemed to too. Definitely good, I'm not sure where these bad reviews are coming from. Did a couple things different, but still sweet. If you think you've seen half the movie in the trailers/commercials, you haven't. Most of the trailer/commercial clips are in the first 20-30 minutes.
It's either mum or ma'am. I guess it's the british accents.
Well saw the movie and I thought it was pretty good.
FIELDS! WHY GOD WHY!?
Im really upset this movie is only 1:45 long, this is the shortest Bond ever, and only the 2nd to run so far under 2hrs. All the other Bond films have been atleast 2hr, and most are 2:10, only Dr. No was significantly under 2hr.
Im going to see it in a few hours, and i'm really hoping the time doesnt play a major factor. I know the movie will feel rushed because as people said it's the most action packed Bond.. but I hope they did it right ;-;
Saw the movie last night and thought it was fine. The plot as a whole made sense to me despite Bond not being very "Bond-like," but IMO that's kind of the point of the movie since it starts immediately where CR left off, and Bond is still a nub-00 at this point. The only thing that really annoyed me about the movie were the shaky-cam action sequences; CR was way better with the long panning sequences compared to QoS's frenetic cuts. Additional comments under the spoiler.
Spoiler: show
Just got back from it, the plot was fine, and thought it did a great job of continuing the Bond reboot. The whole water plot was weak, as well it was made to be, as that isnt the real villan hes going after, it was just a filler to show us how BOnd developed into how he is.
I did end up as I feared, feel like I was rushed just a bit, but it wasnt all too bad. There are currently two more movies planned to continue this reboot, and going after the main villan, and I hope it continues to be this good. Now that they have the 'how Bond became Bond' out of the way, we can get back to focusing on the Bond weve known to love.
Barbara Broccoli said that the next movie is gonna complete the storyline with Quantum; but that she expects that next movie will have Bond being Bond.
I saw it yesterday and I enjoyed it. I dont tend to compare movies with the previous ones, I like to let each movie tell their own respective story. It was good
Saw it today and thought it was good. Was entertained throughout. Random, but the multi-touch table was incredible.
Yeah it was, cue taken from http://www.microsoft.com/surface/index.html but ofcourse highly improved on what it is currently. I was too busy watching the table and released that I missed everything that was said.
Ms. Fields was not the "Bond" girl in this movie. She had the same role as the hot Persian chick in CR that he seduces right before the airport chase scene. And I would never classify her as a Bond girl.
I dont think anyone called her a Bond girl, hell, I wouldnt even really consider Olga to be one either.
I enjoyed the movie and still thing craig is a great bond. I would have liked more story development but i guess thats what the next one is for.