Yeah it is ridiculous and seems its something every pre-season unfortunately and yes sir I know Gastonia well. Used to go down there from time to time, a lot of nifty "shops" if you will... >.>
Yeah it is ridiculous and seems its something every pre-season unfortunately and yes sir I know Gastonia well. Used to go down there from time to time, a lot of nifty "shops" if you will... >.>
KU is a better team than Mizzou. What you fail to realize is that you don't pay close attention to the big 12, and are biased as a direct result. Where you look at Nebraska, CO, and lol, I see teams that have been perennial contenders for just as long as the SEC teams-- that have had "down" years due to the rise of K-State, KU, and Mizzou, and having to play teams between Texas, OU, Tech, and OSU every year.
The point is what I said: if you're in the big 12 and not in the top 10, you're losing at least 2-3 games to championship contenders every year.
West Virginia (edit: err mixed up schedules nvmnd, I meant the colorado schedule not KU)? 4 games against top 15 teams isn't enough? This is where you're being biased and saying the big 12 as a whole sucks-- you're discounting anything and everything that's not a top 10 team when looking at the big 12, crediting teams like auburn (who got outplayed in every way by KSU last year and barely eeked out a win at home) with crap like "oh they could've been 11-2."As far as Kansas having a super hard schedule... other than @OK/@Mizzou, and Texas/Texas Tech (since you seem to think so highly of them), where's a hard game? South Florida? Fucking Nebraska? If this were the 90's, then maybe. That's just my opinion.
A. Sarcasm pointing out how retarded it is for you to tell me to learn to read when what you wrote came across as exactly what I saidAs far as knowing how to write? You really shouldn't be saying that to me when reading your shit is like I'm reading something a high schooler wrote in an Instant Messaging program.
B. Not going to get offended by you attempting to insult my writing, it's a forum, I don't try to type everything perfectly and use perfect grammar at every moment, but I'm far, far, far from being some idiot that doesn't know how to write, and you know this just as well as I do.
I have excellent reading comprehension, I assure you. Take off the blinders and read the paragraph again, what I inferred was *exactly* what you implied. If you want to claim that's not what you meant, fine, even though you and I both know it is, you can at least admit the way you wrote it separated the 2 descriptions and the proper way to interpret it was exactly as I stated.No. I meant as an overall schedule, it's not THAT hard. I guess I should have clarified? I suppose I thought that a guy of your age would have the comprehension skills to recognize what I meant, but I suppose I'll take the blame for "not knowing how to write." Sorry.
This is exactly what I'm getting at: you think KU and Mizzou will be busts because you haven't been paying attention to the programs. Mangino is a product of Snyder-- just like the Stoops and many other extremely successful coaches. He's done exactly what Snyder did, he built a fantastic defense and used the chance to start right away to get a great offensive line going. He has built the program from the ground up, and when he finally got a quarterback worth using became a championship contender. This will be a tough year, as much as you want to insult the schedule while claiming the difficulty of it means they'll bust, the schedule is extremely tough. They'll come out of it looking like one of the best in the country though, and Mangino will have teams competing for the championship as long as he's coaching.I don't think all the teams in the Big 12 will be busts, or half the teams. I thinkt hey'll be back to what they were before last year. When was the last time Kansas and Mizzou had that sort of season that they had last year? Do you want to look it up or should I? I'll let you, since you seem to be a super supporter of theirs. I've said so many god damn times that I think Auburn is ranked too high considering what they are coming back with. I think Arkansas will suck. I think Vandy and Ole Miss will be back at the bottom. I don't think Mississippi State will be good either. Alabama hasn't been really THAT good in a while. I'm BASHING "my" conference openly. How can that be biased? The fact that the SEC has won 2 National Championships (who knows if it could have been three when Auburn went 13-0 in '04) means they haven't been the best? Okay, sure. Whatever.
Mizzou has done very interesting things in creating a pretty massive following in Kansas City, getting a lot of big name players that were expected to go to K-State. They've also had good teams for a long long time, they haven't been #1 but again, if you don't know about Mizzou's recent history it's because you're not paying attention to the big 12.
Indeed. I said before, the big 12 has had weak schedules in the past. The thing is, they've learned from it, and are scheduling the biggest games they can get.The Big 12 has had weak scheduling for a while. Kansas had a weak schedule last year. Now they get a tough schedule. We'll see how good they are.
You think Auburn is going to agree to schedule a home and home with an unranked K-State team that should've beaten them in their house in the first game of the year when they were projected to be contenders? Lousville being scheduled when they're one of the top teams in the country and appearing to be ready to remain that way for a decent while does mean a lot, it means exactly what it shows: Prince went out to schedule the best game he could possible get another coach to agree to.
No, seriously, dude, read through the posts again. I came in with "hey guys that were bashing the big 12, check this out, it's actually pretty good." You came back with a comment about how 4 top 15 teams is not that hard (I don't give a fuck if you're talking about the entire schedule, throw away every other game, it's still damn hard) and I made a sarcastic comment about how there's no reason to read on if you're going to be that ridiculous. You came back dripping sand all over the page.I don't have sand anywhere "dude", but face the facts.
Nine. How many from the big 12? You guessed it, 9.How many bowl teams did the SEC have last year in a "down" year with all of the upsets?
They BARELY beat K-State at home, it was a fluke win, KSU should've won the game.Auburn could have been 11-2 last year if they had a DECENT QB in the South Florida/Miss. State games and didn't turn the ball over 5 times each game. They didn't get pounded. They got beat in OT and 19-14. They had no offense, but they had a Top 10 Nationwide defense. You gonna argue with that?
Tech had a so-so year last year, and averaged 42 points a game. They're stronger on defense this year, and have the best quarterback they've had during this whole run of craziness.And LOL. You seriously think Texas Tech could have scored 60 points on anyone? How many do you think Auburn, LSU, Georgia, or even some of the Pac 10 teams would have allowed to them? No where near 60. Virginia held them to 31 (albeit Virginia lost), Mizzou held them to 10, Colorado held them to 26. Then again, they scored 49, 45, 59, 45, 75. OH WAIT. Against who? Southern Methodist, UTEP, Rice, OK State, and Northwestern State. My bad. Here I thought this wasn't high school. Other than the Oklahoma State game, none of those were that impressive. Scoring 75 points in a game is like a fucking video game, but do it against someone important. The Oklahoma State LOSS was also funny, because last I checked, Troy beat OK State 41-23. Georgia dominated them.
Please, tell me what I'm wrong about. I'm wrong that the big 12 is not as bad as people make it out to be? I'm wrong that having the most teams in the top 15 implies that it's a tough conference to play in? I'm wrong that the big 12 coaches have learned their lesson and started trying to schedule tougher games?Also, since you have severely pissed me off, let's go back to last year's Strength of Schedules with the Big 12 vs SEC, since that's what you want to do; compare the two conferences.
SEC:
#1 LSU - 11
#2 Georgia - 6
#11 Tennessee - 14
#15 Auburn - 18
#17 Florida - 2
Big 12:
#5 Mizzou - 12
#7 Kansas - 60
#9 Oklahoma - 24
#14 Texas - 42
#23 Texas Tech - 62
Source: http://www.sportsline.com/collegefootball/polls/119
So hmn. Other than Mizzou and Oklahoma... the other three aren't that impressive. Wouldn't you agree? Now this doesn't mean a whole lot, but comparing the schedules, even with the SEC's cupcakes, it's still a huge fucking difference.
I can't see the SOS for this year just yet, or at least I can't find it since the USA Today Poll only came out yesterday, so I can't do much about that. Either way, if you want to continue to compare shit, go for it. It was never about SEC being better than everyone. I never ever said that in that way. I just said they are more proven, and that teams are perinneally challenged.
If you want to be blinded by the Big 12 and not admit you may be wrong about some things, then feel free. One thing though I can assure you of is I'm done arguing. I've provided information to back most of my claims, I've discussed it the best way I could, so I'm done. No more worries about my wall of texts. I'll just go back to posting "I like cake" or whatever to make threads easier to deal with.
That's the whole issue here, you don't even know what you're arguing, with or against. All I've said all along is that people bashing the big 12 aren't looking closely enough, and don't realize especially that it's not just the HALF THE DAMN CONFERENCE THAT'S IN THE TOP 15 that are tough, but the other teams look worse because they have to play all of those teams on top of playing each other.
Jesus Christ, just once I wish Steve Smith would stop acting like an angsty teenager and just do his job.
lol @ steve smith, what a fucking idiot being a veteran reciever and highly respected around the league for being a dynamic reciever(when healthy) to go pull an idiot stunt like that. IMO he's lucky it wasent more than 2games.
He'd be out a season and a half if he was a Bengal.
I better be in the same FF league this year :D
A&M will win 10 games this year...mark it
Cowboys will be crowned Super Bowl Champs
Tony Homo will choke, I don't even think it matters how much talent he ends up with around him. Regular season heroics never cut it in the playoff's. I noticed even ESPN is cock riding the cowboys hard when the NFC should be worried about the saints(IF, BIG IF) they can stay healthy.
I just keep waiting for some kind of massive Cowboys implosion where Romo realizes he doesn't know what he's doing, people figure out the offense, TO throws a fit too many and they end up missing the playoffs. I think this is the year but they'll probably end up winning the division.
I would actually enjoy watching the Cowboys in the SuperBowl against one of the big AFC teams. The Colts or Pats would lay it on them. Hell, I think the Jags would lay a beatdown.
1 hour and 15 minutes until first kickoff of the 2008 season :D
let's see how Colt B. does haha.
With what offense? It takes more than really good RB's to beat the Cowboys. See Cowboys 07 Schedule, keeping AP/Jacobs/Westbrook 2x/Clinton Portis/Ryan Grant all under 100. The only RB to break 100 was Portis in Week 17 when we were resting our starters. Jacksonville wouldn't even come close to giving us a beatdown. If anything it'll be the opposite.
The Cowboys has improved drastically on defense, i.e. no more Jacque Reeves/Nate Jones. It'll be close games if anything.
Go Broncos!
Fuck Javon Walker and the Raiders!
Hall of Fame game, whooo!
Finally, preseason football starts!
Woot. Time to watch some 2nd and 3rd string action.