As for 'presenting it as fact', I disagree. 'All but outright' and 'little-to-no' were not arbitrarily chosen terms in that post. Use of those words would have, I'd hoped, indicated that I did - and still do - acknowledge that what I presented is based simply on evidence and indeed has not explicitly been stated by the overlords at SE. Do I think that anyone hoping they won't require a base Mythic is kidding themselves? Absolutely. I fail to appreciate what's so arrogant about that, though.
If the post was lacking explicit 'in my opinion guys!!' disclaimers alongside the non-100% qualifiers then I apologise for that. That said, fact: I didn't state anything as fact that wasn't based on inferential evidence, which pretty much shines a large 'here, make your own mind up!' beacon on the whole post.