
Originally Posted by
RKenshin
This isn't correct, at all. <.<
Let's use some common sense here, they just said in that statement that none of these NMs were intended to be fought for such long periods of time.
At the same time not too long ago, they came out and said that AV is expected to be an 18+ hour fight. And if you even ever watched the AV video you'll see, thanks to the day timers, that it had to have been over the course of about that time anyway. And they KNEW how to beat it. So regardless of whether you trust what they meant by '18-hours', you have the cold hard fact of that video.
Despite that huge and obvious contradiction, you think that it's the players at fault and not the company?
This is simply them saving their asses and putting on a face for the public and media. It's called saving face. There are so many contradictions in their statement that if you can't figure out how obvious it is they're just covering their asses with lies and excuses, that it's just sad.
Another example being how the NM rage timers they implemented a while back, were according to their statement 'a technique used to keep players from fighting an NM for too long, to keep them from spending excessive amounts of time and effort on them.' But we know for a fact that this was originally implemented to prevent old grieving tactics that kept valuable NMs in one time slot for weeks or even months.
SE is never going to come out and admit they made some serious mistakes, they never do. Even when they (finally) started the 2h adjustment they made excuses. It's always been this way and right now is no different, and more than ever it's plainly obvious to anyone with a shred of common sense about SE and this game. I don't know how some people can't see that.
And come on, as if it isn't obvious enough this is to save face for the public and press, ask yourself one question. Would these adjustments have happened so quickly (if at all) if not for all the negative press? If you think the answer to that is no, then I think you know what side of the argument you should be on.
The JP guy said it best:
And regardless of whether or not either side of this argument is right, Acturus hit the nail on the head.