RAWR back2u2
Sorry, Usually only reserve my name calling for people like Churchill.
well I'm a neocon and you're really smart for discovering that
and a dirty republican.
There are very few people who are actually anti-earmark. I'm proud to have one of them (Feingold) as my representative, and I think the anti-earmark claims of shitty opportunistic politicans like Palin who are OK with earmarks as long as THEY get the money really devalue the efforts of people who are actually trying to stop or slow wasteful spending.
Earmarks are a red herring, 1% of the budget ffs.
also I think the point about other female republicans is that they are more qualified/less fucking retarded, not that they're ideologically opposed to the base or mccain.
then you have too much faith in the 2-party system
Demos, question, at some points you like to say how you think both parties fail, and at others you seem to express a desire for defending the, clearly more prone to lying Republican party. Can you say why?
Clearly he doesn't agree that the republicans are more prone to lying.
But you don't have to throw out as many 'lying' charges when you're in front in polls, which is probably why there are more reports of Obama strategists/supporters calling Republicans liars than the other way around. Republicans can save theirs up for when Obama begins to catch up in the numbers. I think this is the most likely source of the disparity.
He's actually a member of the insignificant minority that not only supports their ideals that lie outside of the 2 party platforms, but will actually use (and you can call me a cynic but if he were in a swing state, waste) his vote on them instead of go with what has become the favored American tradition of choosing the lesser of two evils. Just like the real presidential debates though, technically we can all just ignore him/them.