Coincidentally (and way off the main topic), did anyone see that Richard Dawkin's website was banned in Turkey?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/sc...on-945289.html
http://richarddawkins.net/
I imagine they aren't big fans of Maher either.
Coincidentally (and way off the main topic), did anyone see that Richard Dawkin's website was banned in Turkey?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/sc...on-945289.html
http://richarddawkins.net/
I imagine they aren't big fans of Maher either.
Please no more stupid giant derails, my neurons can't handle it.
So the VP debate moderator has a financial stake in Obama winning the election. Wonder if she'll state that before the debate starts.
As if Biden even needs the help.
Yes, because the moderator did such a good job stopping McCain's constant interruptions of Obama.
Sadly Biden can't really tear into Palin as we'd all like to see him do. If he's harsh on her, she'll play the victim card and McCain's campaign will paint him as a bully. Since Palin is OMGSOFOLKSY and Biden is kind of a douchebag, the charge will stick and might drive away more female votes. All he can do is stick to his campaign's positions, keep his own answers locked down(IE remembering who was president when and whether or not TV existed at the time) and give her enough rope to hang herself.
Now, as to the financial crisis, Paulson's job is one of those that "serves at the pleasure of the president(slurpslurp)", right? Congress doesn't have the authority to fire him? If so I really hope Pelosi gives one of her oh-so-scary speeches about getting his ass out.
In a related note, Aurik, a couple pages back you said the credit freeze had to do with the prospect of the bill moreso then the substance, that banks were holding on to these bad mortgages rather than selling at reduced price since the government might step in any day and buy them at near full price. Would it be fair to say then that congress coming out and saying "the deal is dead and we aren't trying again" would have a similar effect to the bill actually being passed?
Sorry if any of that was nonsensical, mind is foggy at this hour.
It's like advertising. Coke or Pepsi. What flavor do you enjoy? Coke or Pepsi. They(media) will ram it down your throats. Coke or Pepsi. You only talk about these 2 candidates and not what's going on in the US. Coke or Pepsi. What issues truly matter to the people of this country only dwindle to what both candidates will try to bolster their "leadership" on you and their own agenda. Coke or Pepsi. Gotta get rid of the current President because he's done the worse since Jimmy Carter and Richard Nixon. Coke or Pepsi. How come we don't talk about Mountain Dew? Probably because it'll lower your sperm count if you drink too much. Coke or Pepsi or Mountain Dew.
Coke is republican right? You know the can is red, not blue.
Anyway, Coke owns pepsi
edit: Actually, RC owns both, so now I'm really confused.
one day, in the not-so-distant future we will choose our president via gladiatorial combat and ballroom dancing.
Wasn't Hitler a great ballroom dancer? Shit, did I just godwin?
While we're on the subject of dictators...
McCain Aspires to be a Dictator
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/01/...pire-dictator/
Now, if this thing gets any traction at all, I'm calling it here and now the response. Words may be slightly adjusted but the points will be as follows.
It was a simple joke.
Complaints of quote taken wildly out of context.
Assurances that McCain stands firmly on the side of voter's rights and the democratic process.
Complaints of "gotcha" journalism by the liberal media.
Blame Obama for... something.
Possibly a video ad to come where Obama is made to say he's the one that wants to be a dictator or supports dictators.
Edit: Somewhere, Palin will conclude that many dictators provide good things for their subjects.