So Bristol could give birth to the Ron Paul of the future to save america
So Bristol could give birth to the Ron Paul of the future to save america
oh god, imagine the VP debate when the moderator pops that question.
biden is gonna have the biggest shit-eating grin on his face.
Do they really only teach abstinence only or do they mix in birth control and other stuff in with it?
I personally think that her daughter's pregnancy is a family matter and her family should be left alone, however, I -seriously- wish this would actually start a real discussion on the abysmal success rate of abstinence only sex education programs with the GOP, but that just isn't likely to happen.
Abstinence only sex education implies exactly that, abstinence only. Its ludicrous and a waste of federal money to believe that you can simply tell teenagers not to have sex. They're going to have sex. Not educating them on contraceptives, especially those which help prevent the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases is just asking for disaster.
Abstinence only, as supported by the GOP, does not include a mix, so no birth control or even condoms, just abstinence. They think it's contradictory to tell them not to have sex (because that's the only thing they want to do) and at the same time give them the means to do it safely. They do seem to like ignoring that abstinence only unanimously fails in comparing to mixed sexual education.
Such is what happens when logic is overridden by ideology.
It's not like you can expect sex ed to never come up again in the campaign though. It is an important issue.
and of course the Biden haters will cry a river if in debate he says "Abstinence only doesn't work" even though it's factual that it's not effective.
but really, WHAT is the problem with teaching contraceptives? its a health issue, not just a moral one. as xavier said, teens are GOING to have sex, and its risky not to teach them how to protect themselves from STDs, much less ruining their lives by having a child too early.
i guess this just shows how incredibly useless abstinence only education really is, doesnt it. thank god the girl didnt get aids instead, that would have been truly tragic.
Speaking of which, are there really people who are pro-life and agree to abortions when it endangers the mother's life or when it was a product of rape? Seems contradictory. Kind of like the combination of Abstinence Only and and anti abortion... and anti gays being able to adopt...
I will cry if I have to watch any of these debates. I would like to see Dr. Paul comment on this at the RNC though lololol