I had no clue that they taught abstinence only in schools. Guess that explains why a town with only 3 high schools had 140 girls pregnant last year. There's no reason both can't be taught.
I had no clue that they taught abstinence only in schools. Guess that explains why a town with only 3 high schools had 140 girls pregnant last year. There's no reason both can't be taught.
if you're gonna knob-slob with the Dr. prefix all the time you might as well show a little non-partisanship and call Obama and Biden with the Attorney prefix or whatever.
also you're crazy, joe biden is an entertaining speaker/debater.
noun, verb, 9/11 etc
actually you should refer to them as Professor Obama and Professor Biden.
Abstinence only in schools is where religion is mixing with government. However, I don't think it's a federal issue. It should be left up to the individual school districts. If your small town wants to have abstinence only, then that fits their views and if they have 140 pregnancies they can blame themselves or TV, but there likely won't be 140 and there's a good chance it'll work in that small town.
Likewise the bigger city could have some infighting between religious folk and more liberal ones, and in those cities both would be taught...but again this isn't a federal issue.
@Kuya
That didn't answer the question though![]()
Captain USAF, Representative from Texas, Dr. Ron Ernest Paul, PhD.
Sorry had trouble finding his rank.
lol.
Point still stands, education is a state issue. If people want to fuck themselves up then they can knock themselves out. You could caveat it though and say if you don't teach sexual education in your schools then your kids can have fun not getting their welfare checks.
That's bordering states rights but it'd be funny.
Umm, teaching/academia doesn't force lifestyle changes. You can learn how to use condoms and still go fuck your life up if you choose. Abstinence would natural be brought up in the topic of sex education, but entirely replacing sex ed with abstinence is the equivalent of Creationism replacing evolution in science class: it's academically dishonest.
No one here can prove evolution exists
You guys always fall for this, yet not even the Nazis fell for Churchill.
I know this is a troll, but yes it can be proven.
There are repeatable experiments that can be done on fruitflies that can produce speciation or "macro-evolution". the experiment takes about 2 months and involves feeding a 1 group of flies a starch based food and a 2nd group a maltose based food. the end result is two populations that cannot produce offspring. you can google: fruit fly speciation for more information.
and evolution below the species level or "micro-evolution" happens anytime you hear about super resistant strains of bacteria.
Only black people think gravity is real because that's how watermelons fall from the KFC tree.
I am from G-Town. However Tacoma and Seattle are the same as far as people go so your point is moot. Though Seattle is in King County iirc, so yea.I assume this is a joke. But you are from Tacoma... so who knows... (Seattle ftw)
Evolution exists, I just alt-tabbed to it to check my email.