Sarah Palin, Republican Vice Presidential Candidate

[SwampdonkeyPLD]

Everything on the interweb MUST be truth!

While this is another person relying on something they were told, not something they themselves did, it is another example.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/...tions_sil.html If I wasn't so stinking poor I might try it myself.

[Rhinox]

People like Jefferson are more like today's Ayers type people than today's politicians, tbh.

Are you insinuating that our founding fathers where unrepentant radicals?! Blasphemy.

[Rhinox]

While this is another person relying on something they were told, not something they themselves did, it is another example.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/...tions_sil.html If I wasn't so stinking poor I might try it myself.

Let me know if you need a hand considering now you're just grasping for straws.

[SwampdonkeyPLD]

Are you insinuating that our founding fathers where unrepentant radicals?! Blasphemy.

I don't think they considered killing 25 million people. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJn5b...n_america.html

What's wrong Rhino, no explanation for it?

[Kuya]

Didn't know I was running for office. It's called an OPINION and I'm allowed to have it whether you like it or not.

Though i agreed with most of your sentiments, saying it's an opinion does not make you immune to being criticized for being ignorant about something.

[Valisk]

Though i agreed with most of your sentiments, saying it's an opinion does not make you immune to being criticized for being ignorant about something.

I'm not asking to be immune. I am undereducated about the specifics of guns but that still doesn't mean I can't have an opinion about them. I'm just standing up for my position, not arguing semantics and proper terminology.

[Maxxthepenguin]

I don't think they considered killing 25 million people. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJn5b...n_america.html

What's wrong Rhino, no explanation for it?

If America's founding required extermination of 10% of its populace who were 100% unrepentant British sympathizers willing to subvert the radical, new American government, they probably would have gone through with it. It wasn't a bloodless affair by any means.

By the way, does that bullshit website where you get everything from post ANYTHING without whining about "OH MAN THE MEDIA WONT COVER THIS THOSE DAMN LIBERALS"

Holy shit they are fucking whiners. There is so much stuff that liberals want covered that isn't getting covered, too.

[Rhinox]

I don't think they considered killing 25 million people. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJn5b...n_america.html

What's wrong Rhino, no explanation for it?

Whats to explain? Didn't know Bill Ayers was Obama's secretary of Education. what is your point?

[Correction]

Except that any kind of gun law is 100% about the semantics and terminology used. You can't simply say "ban a gun that goes pew pew and shoots real fast" when enshrining it into the law of the land. This is the true Achilles Heel of gun law and why it's almost impossible to enact it. The reality is that individual, largely unrestricted gun ownership is here to stay and there's not much anybody can do about it.

[Kiro]

I didn't vote.

EAT IT.

All the problems this country will face in the future are all on me.~

[archibaldcrane]

Look, criticize the source, talk about whining, whatever.

If Obama is accepting completely unverifiable campaign contributions, even to the point of manipulating the credit card company standard verification checks to do, that's fucked up. Either refute the claim, express your opinion that it matters or doesn't matter, or honestly, shut the fuck up.

Shooting the messenger is a fun secondary sport after you call out the messenger on its particular bullshit. You can't do it the other way around.

[Saga]

The only thing that article proves is if I want to donate to his campaign and type in gibberish in all the fields, I can.

[Tristam]

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...for_fraud.html

So what's the explanation for that? It can't possibly be what I'm thinking.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the...mpaign_on.html

yawn...

[Valisk]

Except that any kind of gun law is 100% about the semantics and terminology used. You can't simply say "ban a gun that goes pew pew and shoots real fast" when enshrining it into the law of the land. This is the true Achilles Heel of gun law and why it's almost impossible to enact it. The reality is that individual, largely unrestricted gun ownership is here to stay and there's not much anybody can do about it.

Point taken. But all I did was state my position. I'll let you guys gripe and complain about the terms I used wrong but I still stand by my position. Whether it's automatic, semi-automatic, manual, gun-powder iron-pouring muskets, I'm anti-conceal carry. Period.

[Maxxthepenguin]

Look, criticize the source, talk about whining, whatever.

If Obama is accepting completely unverifiable campaign contributions, even to the point of manipulating the credit card company standard verification checks to do, that's fucked up. Either refute the claim, express your opinion that it matters or doesn't matter, or honestly, shut the fuck up.

Shooting the messenger is a fun secondary sport after you call out the messenger on its particular bullshit. You can't do it the other way around.

That's why I said I want to find somebody who I trust to test this out and that, if verified, it's a big problem. Any takers?

The last part of my post was included in my post for a reason.

[SwampdonkeyPLD]

Whats to explain? Didn't know Bill Ayers was Obama's secretary of Education. what is your point?

I meant the Obama credit card problem not the Ayers stuff.

[Rhinox]

If there is proof that something being done underhanded yeah it should be investigated.

[Maxxthepenguin]

If there is proof that something being done underhanded yeah it should be investigated.

You mean it should be investigated to see if there is any proof. You don't wait for proof then, investigate...

So, investigate.

[Rhinox]

You mean it should be investigated to see if there is any proof. You don't wait for proof then, investigate...

So, investigate.

well more like a really credible lead not just some partisan accusation

edit; off to work

[Maxxthepenguin]

well more like a really credible lead not just some partisan accusation

It's not especially expensive to figure out if there's something wrong in this case.

Does anyone here have 15 bucks to spare to try it?