What does that even mean?
So as long as you discipline your child for whatever 'negative' thing they do, it's all gravy?
The pregnancy does matter.
I am not familiar with whatever mud-slinging was done to Obama's wife but it's not the case w/ Palin.
No one is talking about the kid as if she's a horrible person for getting knocked. No one in the MSM at least.
The point made (over and over in this thread for the last 5 pages or so) is that Palin is a politician. A politican in the public spotlight. A politician in the public spotlight that advocates a specific policy.
On a purely superficial level, her daughter being pregnant at 16 is very ironic. Like it's been said, if Sarah Palin were just a mom and not a politician trying to tell other people what she thinks is right for their kids, then it would be different. It's incorrect to put the blame solely on the parents - things aren't that simple. Parents should teach their kids about life and whatnot but they can't be there 24/7. I think people understand that about this situation. It's just different when you're preaching.
I mean that all you can do as a parent is teach what is right and punish what is wrong. At a certain point, it doesn't matter how good of a parent you are. If your daughter gets pregnant at 16, how is it hypocritical to say you think 16 year olds should not be having sex?
What I do find ironic/hypocritcal? Saying Palin shouldn't be in a position of high power because she has a special needs child. WOMEN SHOULD BE IN THE KITCHEN MAKIN SANDWICHES AND RAISIN' KIDS
If her daughters 17, to be 18 on Oct 18s, and she's five months pregnant...I'm not very good at math, but that doesn't make her 16 at time of conception...not that it's really relevant, but if you're going to say it to reinforce a point, it should be correct.
25 pages wow, I guess it worked, this should have so been the thread about Obama's amazing speech. Q___________Q
Remember me saying how brilliant a short term move this was...The DNC seems like it was 15 months ago. It is backfiring much faster than anyone could have imagined though.
@Demo
Yea, you're right somewhat. I don't think Palin is a hypocrite in the sense that she WANTED her daughter to get knocked up at 17 while advocating against such things publically.
I find it ironic that what happened, happened. It's hypocritical in that Palin - as a public official - can't instill the same values in her own children that she believes ought to be ENACTED THROUGH NATIONWIDE POLICY.
3) no one is attacking her daughter for having sex. I don't think it proves Palin is a bad parent either. it's just an ironic highlight of Palin's awful abstinence-only stance; you HAVE to admit the comedic/tragic irony here.
5) the polls are starting to open up; Obama has hit 50/51 on a couple national polls. Check the RNC protest topic for the posts I've made there. But you want reasons? a mix of racism, ignorance/stupidity, loads of negative press early on (secret muslim, madrassa, terrorist fist-jab, Wright is a racist who hates america, rezko (omg a legal house purchase!!!!!), ayers (omg reformed criminal who happened to serve on a charity with Obama), overplayed Hillary/Obama divisiveness, too much attention on an extremely small number of PUMAs- all of this kind of plays into the stupidity/ignorance thing), and successful GOP smear campaigning- as awful as the Hilton and other flat-out lying ads are to anyone with a brain, they worked in the polls.
6) Obama's speech was rather good. He got into policy and plans, and highlighted some common ground that both sides can identify with. Hillary and Bill did nice jobs too. I thought Kerry delivered a good speech, but part of that is the novelty of Kerry not delivering a terrible speech. A lot of pre-Obama speeches were really heavy on rehashing McCain=Bush, but the ones I mentioned stand out. I missed Michelle's speech but it's supposed to be a good one as well, but I don't imagine you'd give a shit about the Obama family story.
No, which is what Palin is advocating when she believes in a nationwide abstinence program. Hence, the lulz.
teaching kids about condoms and other forms of contraception and safe sex in general isn't about instilling beliefs in children, it's about teaching them life skills. I already said not to go with some strawman bullshit like it advocates that teenagers should be having sex and lots of it, so cut it out.
lol I missed that
lulz
edit: no more posting right now, i need to focus on doing kollege good
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/0..._n_123205.html
fucking fuck fuck fuck what the hell. c'mon Palin apologists, sadly I can go all day with this shit ._."Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God," she exhorted the congregants. "That's what we have to make sure that we're praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God's plan."
Alaska's governor asked the audience to pray for another matter -- a $30 billion national gas pipeline project that she wanted built in the state. "I think God's will has to be done in unifying people and companies to get that gas line built, so pray for that," she said.
Using condoms or birth control pills if you so decide to have sex to avoid pregnancies or STDS is a belief?
......
What is with you people?
by people, i mean demos209384209403
To be honest, I don't think it will be, but that's my personal opinion. Experts have been proven wrong over and over this campaign, and you have the pretentious pugnacity to declare you know better. Most polling places only call landlines from previously registered voters, most of Obamas surge in the past was newer voters and young people. I don't think anyone can make an accurate prediction of what is going to happen in this race, and I highly doubt you are any more qualified to be making calls like that.
My wife and I were both called on our cell phones, both under 25, and she's never voted before. I have.
Edit: I hung up btw.