If elected, McCain would keel over within the first year.
Clinton to Lincoln?
I think Bush and Kennedy are similar too.
both presidents right?
The reasons I dislike Clinton are the reasons he was a bad president, comparing him to Lincoln is pretty outlandish. Kennedy was also pretty flawed but came around near the end, plus he started the special operations community which began it's path to what it is now.
I think the media has a monetary bias.
I just think it's odd they media isn't touting McCain more because of his Iran policy and how that affects Israel, unless...well I can't get into that but yeah. It's odd.
An utterly fascinating choice. I have no idea how she'll do, I don't know her at all.
She could wow us all in debates or she could be a complete dud; only the 10 people who live in alaska have any kind of clue.
What a strange, strange election.
Yeah... I'll just leave these here.
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/...ain-Health.phpOriginally Posted by http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/us/politics/09mccain.html?_r=2&ref=politics&oref=slogin&oref=s login
I think you missed the point of my comparison: guys with little experience going on to win and be able to do the job. I'm sure you hate bill for some asinine reasons and maybe a few good reasons, but saying he was incompetent is dishonest. Dude had a surplus, which is more than most can say.
A politician being a hypocrite? Unthinkable.
It's a smart move by his campaign, especially timing it directly after the DNC.
And as for Bill Clinton, he ran the country very well, but of course 90% of people are only going to remember him for the Lewinisky scandal and assume that he was horrible.
It's not smart to be hypocritical of your main campaign themes in the middle of the damn campaign. I guess there's a point in causing some hooplah right after the most successful political address of our era, but I don't see this working out well for McCaine in the long run.