Edit: nvm. Someone find that gif of mccain humping a highschool girl and chris hansen peepin around the corner D:
Because she's only wearing panties and she's like 8 years old. That's old enough for people to know not to just walk around naked for extended periods of time. It's also old enough to be considered borderline child pornography, were it a real picture (though aren't realistic drawings illegal, too?).
For clarification, though, I (and I'm hoping others) aren't looking at her in a sexual "oh she's hot I'd totally bang her" context. It's more of a sexual context because the girl is in an odd situation that bears a lot of skin.
I thought she was in the middle of changing and was about to go into her closet then it opened up to that, thing. It's her fucking room. Borderline child pornography? That's so lol. I'm no expert on CP, but even a pubescent school boy can tell the difference.Because she's only wearing panties and she's like 8 years old. That's old enough for people to know not to just walk around naked for extended periods of time.
http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/tampa-sea-monster.jpg
Teh fuck shoop da whoop.
So you're saying that you wouldn't have any problem with that image being shown to elementary school students? It's not borderline pornographic in the sense that it's meant to sexually arouse people, but if you were to go around taking pictures of people without their permission while they're changing, it would easily be at least some sort of sex crime. And if you're taking pictures of a little girl while she's changing, with or without her permission, you're going to have some explaining to do if people find the picture.
You could make the argument that it's art, so relating it to real life is irrelevant, but I'm fairly sure that photo-realistic drawings and paintings are considered illegal as well when it comes to child pornography cases. My argument isn't to say that the image is some sort of depraved form of cp, but I'm just saying that you can't claim that the picture has absolutely nothing implicating anything sexual.
And to get a little back on track, I just remembered having this picture:
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h1...wikilolmz8.gif
IT'S A TRAP! </justletitdie>
Yes add pics for a better wiki. Nothing will happen promise!
Just on a random side note: his pictures aren't painted, all of them are photographs...says so on the website.
Prescott ftw?
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...eenshot024.jpg
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...papa/LAZAH.jpg
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1.../Origional.jpg
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...pa/SOWRONG.jpg
AND EVERYONES FAVORITE PICTURE
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...a/FUCKTHAT.jpg
Some oldies but..meh...
The last one is in a spoiler tag for a reason. Be warned, NSFM.
http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/5454/89114929fb9.gif
http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/2846/78172308jz7.jpg
Decided to put this one in a spoiler as well. People tend to get pissed at the smallest things and I don't feel like hearing it.
Spoiler: show
NSFM
You have been warned. There is a much larger set of this but I think you get the idea of what has happened.
Spoiler: show
Meatgrinder *fapfapfapfapfap*
http://www.funnychill.com/files/extr...of-meth-01.jpg
from Faces of Meth | Meth Photos
basically a site showing ealier mug shots of people, then them arressted again months/years later after they are hardcore on meth
hotlinking failure.
maybe he was trying to post a picture of funnychill.com, didya think of that?
fucking spider pic
just when I had forgotten about the OTHER spider pic
fucking fuck fuck