Page 43 of 44 FirstFirst ... 33 41 42 43 44 LastLast
Results 841 to 860 of 871

Thread: Election Day Thread     submit to reddit submit to twitter

  1. #841
    Black Belt
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,799
    BG Level
    8

    I'd say logically the SC should be able to strike down gay marriage bans but I don't trust the current court enough to say that with confidence :/

  2. #842
    Brown Recluse
    Sweaty Dick Punching Enthusiast

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    28,484
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Unicorn

    Quote Originally Posted by Beckwin View Post
    I'd say logically the SC should be able to strike down gay marriage bans but I don't trust the current court enough to say that with confidence :/
    Isn't that what happend last time? The people voted for the ban, the court overruled.

  3. #843
    Certified Enhancement Shaman
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,872
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Meph Taru
    FFXIV Server
    Diabolos

    Coleman 1,211,643
    Franken 1,211,167

    lol, he keeps getting closer

  4. #844
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,210
    BG Level
    9
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Quote Originally Posted by Meph View Post
    awww man...

    Coleman 1,211,584 42%
    Franken 1,210,894 42%
    Barkley 437,405 15%

    100% precincts reporting - Updated 2 minutes ago
    (according to CNN's tracker)
    All absentees counted, too?

  5. #845
    Official THE Alpha and Omega
    Moderator

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    5,892
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut

    Quote Originally Posted by Khamsin View Post
    All absentees counted, too?
    By law, under .5% margin means a recount in Minnesota.

    Just wait

  6. #846
    TOO MUCH MAN
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8,264
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Khamsin View Post
    All absentees counted, too?
    Almost certainly not I would imagine. I don't know about other states, but my ballot said that it would be counted if postmarked on or before election day, and I don't think something postmarked then would have arrived by now. I could be wrong though.

  7. #847
    Un-Rad Conrad
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,019
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Carbuncle

    Quote Originally Posted by Beckwin View Post
    I'd say logically the SC should be able to strike down gay marriage bans but I don't trust the current court enough to say that with confidence :/
    The Supreme Court? They'll never take a case like that, ever.

    Far too controversial and polarizing for them to actually get off of their asses and affect something that matters for a significant portion of the population.

  8. #848
    Ridill
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    13,568
    BG Level
    9

    Quote Originally Posted by Skirkle View Post
    The Supreme Court? They'll never take a case like that, ever.

    Far too controversial and polarizing for them to actually get off of their asses and affect something that matters for a significant portion of the population.
    Yea seriously, Brown vs Board of Education was a total fluke.

  9. #849
    Un-Rad Conrad
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,019
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Carbuncle

    In the contemporary era, though? The Supreme Court has done little more than sit on their hands for quite a while now.

    If they haven't, they sure aren't proving that they're doing anything noteworthy.

  10. #850
    Brown Recluse
    Sweaty Dick Punching Enthusiast

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    28,484
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Unicorn

    I think he was talking about the California Supreme court.

  11. #851
    United States of Smash!
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    8,818
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Skirkle View Post
    The Supreme Court? They'll never take a case like that, ever.

    Far too controversial and polarizing for them to actually get off of their asses and affect something that matters for a significant portion of the population.
    Except it was a supreme court decision in the first place that made it legal in California when it did.


    ....wasn't it?

  12. #852
    Brown Recluse
    Sweaty Dick Punching Enthusiast

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    28,484
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Unicorn

    Quote Originally Posted by zoobernut View Post
    Except it was a supreme court decision in the first place that made it legal in California when it did.


    ....wasn't it?
    It was, but only cause they overturned the vote to ban it.

    So I think the Scoreboard is:

    Voted for ban, Court overturned, voted for ban again.

  13. #853
    United States of Smash!
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    8,818
    BG Level
    8

    I thought at a certain point the supreme court can stop any initiatives from even being considered and put on the ballot. When is there decision final and upheld?

    Otherwise states could be going back and forth like this for a very long time.

  14. #854
    Salvage Bans
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    764
    BG Level
    5

    Quote Originally Posted by Dimmauk View Post
    It was, but only cause they overturned the vote to ban it.

    So I think the Scoreboard is:

    Voted for ban, Court overturned, voted for ban again.
    I'm not from CA but I thought it was just a vote for ban... Court ruled it unconstitutional ... voted for constitution amendment to make that not able to happen again?

  15. #855
    I'm not safe on my island
    Nikkei will still get me.

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    20,043
    BG Level
    10

    Here in the United States, President-elect Obama stayed mostly out of public view Wednesday, one day after his historic election. In his first major staffing move, Obama has offered Democratic Congress member Rahm Emanuel of Chicago the position of White House Chief of Staff. Emanuel served as an aide under the Clinton administration and has been a key Democratic Party leader in Congress. On foreign policy, Emanuel is thought to represent the right wing of the Democratic Party. He has vocally backed Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and Gaza and its 2006 attack on Lebanon. Obama’s transition team has begun to prepare for taking office. The group is headed by John Podesta, President Clinton’s former chief of staff and the president of the Center for American Progress.
    Already disappointing.

  16. #856
    blax n gunz
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    11,141
    BG Level
    9

    Quote Originally Posted by Saphirea View Post
    I'm not from CA but I thought it was just a vote for ban... Court ruled it unconstitutional ... voted for constitution amendment to make that not able to happen again?
    This.

    This is the fucking reason it should require a 2/3 vote to amend the constitution of California, not a bare majority. It now requires moving the heavens and earth to undo this goddamn mistake.

    I hate our voter initiatives system so fucking much every election.

  17. #857
    Brown Recluse
    Sweaty Dick Punching Enthusiast

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    28,484
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Unicorn

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuya View Post
    Already disappointing.
    Why?

    Rahm Emanuel is entitled to his views.

  18. #858
    I'm not safe on my island
    Nikkei will still get me.

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    20,043
    BG Level
    10

    I certainly don't know if most voter initiative systems are used for bad purposes, but it sure this sure does seem like a swell way to use democracy.
    Rahm Emanuel is entitled to his views.
    An advisor to Obama.

  19. #859
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,652
    BG Level
    6

    From another NY Times article:
    “But Mr. Emanuel has worked at good relations with Republicans, and has the grudging respect of some. Three years ago, when Representative Tom Cole of Oklahoma sought to be the House Republicans’ campaign chairman, he distributed a dozen talking points to his party colleagues. No. 1: “Rahm Emanuel is a world-class political operator,” so Republicans needed Mr. Cole’s political experience.
    Soon after Mr. Emanuel’s election in 2002, he called Representative Ray LaHood, a Republican from downstate Illinois. Since then, Mr. LaHood said, the two have cooperated on legislation and co-hosted bipartisan dinners, including a half-dozen this year. Each of them invites about six or seven legislators from their respective parties to a Capitol Hill restaurant for “free flowing” discussions.
    “He knows you need Republicans to get anything done,” Mr. LaHood said.
    Late last week, Mr. Emanuel called Mr. LaHood for advice about his career. Mr. LaHood once was the chief of staff to a former Republican minority leader of the House, Robert Michel.
    “A chief of staff is sort of the alter ego of the president,” Mr. LaHood said. “Philosophically, on principles and values, they just have to be totally in sync.” He thinks Mr. Emanuel would be “a perfect fit” for Mr. Obama.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/06/us...cs/06rahm.html

  20. #860
    Brown Recluse
    Sweaty Dick Punching Enthusiast

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    28,484
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Unicorn

    I just found out what Rahm Emanuel's middle name is!

    Its Saddam! OMG! we gunna die!


    Seriously, Rahm Emanuel is a good pick. He has been there, done that already. He knows how the White House politics works.

Page 43 of 44 FirstFirst ... 33 41 42 43 44 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Offical Election 2006 Thread.
    By Palin in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 76
    Last Post: 2006-11-09, 19:09