Best South Park episode ever.
You could try reading what I posted before discussing it. I wasn't alone, I was with my dad in our living room. The dog was in the next room over, which was separated by a divider to keep him from getting into the living room in the first place, which he obviously jumped over. And no, I wasn't bothering the dog, I was sitting on the floor playing with toys. This dog had grown up since it was a puppy in the same house with me, and had been entirely friendly with me, and as far as I know, everyone else up until that incident.
Since you skipped the question in my last post, exactly what type of training should this dog have had to prevent this?
http://photos.oes.org/albums/userpic...irstSeason.jpg
I'm going to show you this picture again, then you can tell me about how ALL AGGRESSIVE BREEDS ARE BEYOND SAVING WE SHOULD KILL THEM ALL!!!
Strawman much? I never made any such argument. I only posted my own experience, and asked WHY people want to keep these kinds of dogs as PETS. I'm sure if we trained small wildcats or wolves really well, we could keep them as pets safely most of the time too, that doesn't mean we should.
And to hiroko, the idea that all breeds of dogs are just as susceptible to becoming aggressive as a result of bad care, abuse, etc. is bullshit. If you put a small amount of effort into researching the topic, you'd find that the majority of dog attacks in the US are by pitbulls and rottweilers. Do pitbulls and rottweilers by themselves make up the majority of pet dogs? No, not even close.
I only vaguely remember the incident, and the dog at all really, I'm going by my parents accounts. Considering my parents have been separated for about 15 years, and didn't even get along back than, I can't imagine they'd both lie about it with the exact same details after this many years.
Are you actually trying to deny that certain breeds were selected for aggression?
Those types of dogs are the best when they're well raised/tamed... When they aren't they really are annoying and dangerous.
I'm in the boat with fantasticdan, if that story is true, snapping the dog's neck was definitely an acceptable course of action. His kid just got mauled, the dog is definitely not trustworthy around children and not worth rehabilitating due to the risk of a relapse. I'd have gone the old yeller route with a shotgun slug.
Yeah, my mom and the hospital she brought me to must have been in on it as well, good call. There's no way an unprovoked dog could attack a kid like that, animals are perfect and peaceful until corrupted by man.
Yeah right dude, there's no way dogs specifically bred to be aggressive could be more prone to aggressive behavior. That's just dog racism.
I'm more of a proponent of good owners making good dogs, but this is related and interesting.
There have been experiments done with foxes, selectively breeding for "tameness". They took the animals with the shortest flight distance / least amount of fear or aggressive behavior exhibited towards their human captors, and bred those animals together. By the tenth generation, nearly twenty percent of all foxes were friendly and quite tame. From this article:
"As the experiment continued, something else began to happen. By generations eight and ten, the foxes started developing spots. Some of them were even marked like border collies. Some foxes developed shorter legs and tails than the wild type, while others had tails that curled over their backs. Even more unusually, a few vixens had estrus cycles longer than normal, and a few also had estrus cycles twice a year. All of these traits are traits of domestic animals."
So... tameness is not only something that you can selectively breed for, but also something that is tied genetically to other physical traits. If you can breed for tameness, you can probably breed the other way... no?
Black people weren't selectively bred for hundreds of years for specific traits, I can't believe you're even trying to make that comparison.
No one is saying every dog from an aggressive breed is going to be aggressive purely due to genetics, but if you don't think dogs selectively bred for aggressive behavior, aren't more likely to be aggressive than a breed that wasn't, than you're an idiot.
They were bred to attack predators like wolves, and assert dominance over animals like sheep, how is that not aggressive?
This is the point I was making earlier.
Yes, animals can be aggressive out of the womb. It's hardwired to them.
There's a story somewhere (I tried to find it, but my google-fu is weak) about some chinese monks or something doing an experiment and bringing up a wildcat as an herbivore. Six years they raised it eating nothing but vegetables, and it was perfectly happy with it; it was mild as a housecat during that time, too. They then turned it loose back to the pride they captured it from. Within a week it was eating meat regularly, two weeks it was hunting on its own. They had to tranq it to bring it back in because it tried to assault them when they approached (it was alone, hunting separately from the pride).
Training suppresses instinct, and I have no doubt that well trained dogs of any breed can be kind and gentle. But some of them naturally lean toward aggression simply because of their bloodlines, and all it takes is one freak incident for them to snap and kill somebody. Meanwhile, there are plenty of breeds that either don't have nearly the same raw power in their physique to put a human at risk, or just simply don't act aggressive unless severely provoked and conditioned.
i thought america was a land where owning guns was legalshouldve shot the fucker, glad the children arnt hurt