also tits are pretty superior, and those are a physical attribute
also tits are pretty superior, and those are a physical attribute
and by that I mean lactating, which provides a still unparalleled nutritional source for infants.
but of course nothing related to childbearing makes it to the olympics so obviously it isn't a type of physical strength that females have!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
so you're saying flexibility isn't useful? just because it doesn't help you pick up rocks?
it's played out but
"shit is situational"
I can show you some sources, whether you can consider them reliable or not is up to you:
Welcome to the Relationship Institute
Women in Logistics | Air Force Journal of Logistics | Find Articles at BNET
University of Helsinki | Science & research
Genetically, women have lower resistance to pain due to lower levels of adrenaline... how they get through natural childbirth is one of those many mysteries. Men probably couldn't stomach or bear it without drugs. Also, many genetic diseases specifically target the male chromosome, which is why they seem to have greater genetic resistance. Unfortunately, it's also untrue. Females are more susceptible to cancer than men. Cancer is one hell of a genetic disease, and while everyone has cancer at some point (some systems are better at eliminating it than others) it tends to be much more destructive in females.Greater resistance to pain and greater resistance against genetic diseases are two well known examples.
I'm not saying it's not useful, I'm saying that it's caused by "weakness" thus they're still inferior. Their tendons and ligaments are just the same as men, it's just that men's muscles tend to be stronger (again, back to the genetic make up) and as such reduce their flexibility.
Gonna go take a shower and revel in my masculinity.
So women don't have a genetic advantage when it comes to genetic diseases because they have XX and not XY? How is that not a physical superiority?2) Genetic diseases being different in males vs females only comes down to X vs Y chromosomes, otherwise they're all fairly equal.Looking back, the tolerance of pain is probably more social than physical, but that doesn't explain why men tolerate pain more.1) Pain tolerance is greater in malesApparently, you understood nothing of the situational importance of this "superiority" you're so proudly professing. How you ever heard the phrase "double edged sword"?I'm not saying it's not useful, I'm saying that it's caused by "weakness" thus they're still inferior. Their tendons and ligaments are just the same as men, it's just that men's muscles tend to be stronger (again, back to the genetic make up) and as such reduce their flexibility.
Strength of muscle has nothing to do with genetic makeup. Male muscles tend to have more mass and develop quicker because testosterone synthesizes protein so quickly - since muscles eat protein for breakfast to develop this is why Men tend to have bigger muscles.
Stronger muscles aren't the reason why men have reduced flexibility. Larger muscle mass is. Slap more muscle mass on a woman and she won't be flexible either. Also, stretching is what yields the most flexibility. Besides this, genetically, if a woman were to have more muscle mass say in the abdominal area and the pelvis didn't separate during birth, they would shoot the child across the room when giving birth. The female frame has to be flexible.
Social stigma.
umm, I think it has more to do with bone structure than muscle weakness, and maybe where weight (excess) tends to be carried. male gymnasts and whatnot are buff as hell yet can get pretty flexible, but I think women have some natural advantages when it comes to doing the splits and more extreme spinal curvatures.
so I'm correct in saying that females have a flexibility advantage in a way independent of muscle mass?
I'm sort of dumbfounded by this; let me pass it up again. Did you just say that flexibility is "weakness" because it is caused by not having larger muscle mass? Explain this in great detail. (not referring to Beckwin)
Congratulations you missed the point! The point is, making a statement about men being physically superior to women is foolish because the variances are much larger from person to person than they are from sex to sex. So making a case that men are stronger than women on the whole can be valid but it doesn't mean it's sound or in any way, shape or form, reasonable.
lol. The life expectancy difference is actually due to men working outside the home or in generally more physically taxing environments than women. The result is that men tend to exhaust their life span more quickly than women do, the gap has actually been closing ever since the women's rights movement since women are not working outside the home in more demanding environments. (Not to say being a stay at home mom isn't demanding but having to go out to work and in particular perform more serious physical labor on a daily basis which women have increasingly become more present in, is the reason life expectancies go down)
Seriously though, it's not because men are "stupid" and go do "stupid things".
I would think the lower average life spans of males are more to due with unhealthy lifestyle choices, like higher rates of tobacco/alcohol/drug use, poorer diet, more physical labor, etc. than anything inherent. I agree using "physically superior" to refer to size/strength/etc is bad wording, and I wouldn't phrase it like that, but in the context it was used in this thread, I think we all knew what people meant.
And are you sure about the cholesterol thing and testosterone/estrogen? I just researched it a bit, and I think you have it backwards. According to everything I can see, both high estrogen and low testosterone levels are associated with high bad cholesterol levels in men, and vice versa.
Flexibility advantage at spreading legs, well yeah.
If you want to get technical women have to be able to spread their legs wider - it aids conception and obviously aids in birth. Think of how much birthing would hurt if their legs were tight and unmovable.
There are some pretty epic chips on shoulders in this thread. With that being said...
The people who seem to be the most 'socially adjusted' that I encounter are the ones who understand that men and women are different, and don't really give a shit. I try to treat everyone with respect. If someone gets offended for something I do, so what? You can't please everyone all the time. In contrast to sensitivity training, I often suggest 'durability training' to people who like to get offended by everything. That's for a different topic though.
The whole point isn't which sex is 'better', it's the concept that men and women (usually) complement each other very well in both physical and mental attributes. Men and women are different, get over it. That doesn't mean that you can't respect them both equally.
People have a hard time grasping 'equality' when the things they are comparing aren't identical, and this is definately the case here. Half of this issue is probably caused by people screaming their heads off for equal treatment causing others to get either annoyed or numb to the issue.
Blah blah blah, life is what you make it, etc.