I think someone already point it out a few pages ago, but "inside joke" is no justification of shitty question.
You don't ask some bullshit that only 5 people in the entire world probably knows about on an interview where at least few thousand people would read and hope for some sort of decent information out of.
Nowadays, it seem all it's good for is zerging on DRK anyway with GA being what it is after the 2h update.
Of course, that same update makes E-body even more godly than it already is though...
i'll play bee mage if this is the af
It's called "making the interviewee feel good." I already explained this. You ask them stuff about stuff they want to answer. Sometimes quite a bit. It gets them excited and wanting to answer your questions. Then you pop them with a hard question about, say drop rates or king camps.
You're in an interview, not an interrogation.
And this is why real discussion suffers. This is why people try to seperate us in red states and blue states, republican and democrat, conservative and liberals. It's much easier to lump someone into a category with a label, and forever talk past them, then to understand there is more than just a false dichotomy. There are gray areas, and people actually wanting to understand each other's position, instead of painting them with a broad brush.Did you actually read the interview, or are you just continuing your little anti-BlueGartr temper tantrum to every post you can find?
To give you the benefit of the doubt, I never said I hated BG. I never said I was against BG. You can be for the improvement of something, without being against it. Hard concept for some, who just want to toss someone in a box. And apparently, an improvement is coming(or coming back, I should say), so it's a start.
To paraphrase Sun Tzu: A man is at his most vulnerable, when he thinks he has you all figured out.