That cover cannot be considered offensive by internet's standards.
The chick can be considered hot though. <.<
That cover cannot be considered offensive by internet's standards.
The chick can be considered hot though. <.<
I'm sorry, I musta missed the part where riots ensued, and a lot of people were killed because of this cover. Please feel free to link me it.
Guess what you're not cool for "thinking on your own" and acting like everyone else is being a hypocrite. You're just fucking stupid and ignorant to even compare the two.
In other Catholic yuletide idiocy this week, the pope warns that saving humanity from homosexual or transsexual behaviour is just as important as saving the rainforest from destruction.
This year's festive smorgasbord of laughter was brought to you by the Vatican: Getting its priorities right since 1095.™Originally Posted by The BBC
Explain how homosexuality and a non-binary view of gender is a threat to human kind without referencing religion, religious texts, or philosophy.
hey now, you cant answer a question with a question
Originally Posted by Firas
uh, ok.Originally Posted by Alleya
crazy man talkingOriginally Posted by Erza
this guy is crazier than pat condell
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the idea that someone is a homosexual usually imply that they've performed, or are planning to perform a homosexual act. At the very least it implies that they've had a homosexual thought, and again if I'm not mistaken, the Catholic church, as do the rest of the western religions, that I'm aware of, believe that impure acts and impure thoughts are one in the same. If you thought it, then you may as well have done it. Which means that the simple concept of being a homosexual would make you a sinner in the eyes of the catholic church, and the pope here is just sugar-coating the issue, trying to sound political and forgiving about the idea, when really hes just as immovable about the topic as the rest of his followers.The Catholic Church opposes gay marriage. It teaches that while homosexuality is not sinful, homosexual acts are.
So loving men shouldn't be a sin, and making love with them in a committed relationship isn't a sin
So, I can think about raping and sodomizing women all I want, just so long as I don't actually do it? And it doesn't become a sin until I perform the act?
And, I would think if the whole idea of "Love the sinner, hate the sin" were true and followed, that members of the catholic church would be a lot more tolerant on the subject than they actually are. But maybe I'm just an optimist.
Nobody cares about this argument. <call5>
How 'bout some sauce on the shoot?
Huzzah, ignorance of science once again triumphs over logic.
There's ample evidence to suggest that overpopulated ecosystems see greater instances of homosexuality in their population, in which case homosexuality may in fact be saving the planet.
What about people with genetically inherited depression? People with recessive genes for sickle cell anemia? Are they sinning if they reproduce, knowing that they have a sickness? This doesn't sound like much of a just, compassionate God by your logic.
I also like how you single out men, as if lesbians don't exist. I think you're betraying your own cultured bias.
Because:Please excuse my ignorance, but whats wrong with what he said, I'm not seeing it.
A: All men suddenly deciding that they will not sleep with women is highly unlikely.
B: Even if all men suddenly decided to do things with men only for pleasure, they can still have sex with women to impregnate them. Nothing about liking men makes you sterile.
C: A woman doesn't need a man to get pregnant, at least, she doesn't need one to impregnate her himself, and men can always just get surrogate mothers if they don't want to be with women.