Someone who I mentioned this to reminded me of this.
It's obviously inspired by Mary Mary, but I'd hardly call it sexual. Even for a Playboy it's seriously tame, hardly worthy of an uproar. Pretty sure we've all been on the internet long enough to be able to conjure up approriate ideas for/links to stuff that would be offensive.
Google Image Search
I win
And they said they were going for a Renaissance type theme, which honestly they made a nice play off of considering the model's name.
Also if you want to play semantics, they were still being respectful by saying "te adoramos" which is actually more along the lines of adoring someone in a respectful way (we adore you Maria). Now had they said "te queremos", which would be more along the lines of physically wanting/loving someone (aka "we want to bang you Maria), then maybe more people could actually justify being offended.
This is so tame for a nudie magazine it isn't even funny.
I'm not religious in any way shape or form and I could tell who it was supposed to be right off the bat.
But they don't have the internets in Mexico so they don't know better =(
Renaissance my ass.
Playboy always did take the high roadThis is so tame for a nudie magazine it isn't even funny.
Here I come to save the thread. Spoiler'd for NSFW:
Spoiler: show
Source: http://popdudish.com/2008/12/15/mari...ersial-photos/
You're welcome.
It's disrespectful and unnecessary. They're acting like churchill: being douchebags with no actual reason.
And if it's in playboy, it's sexual. Always, you stupid cunts.
Why are we debating religious acceptance of homosexuals in a thread where we should only be focusing on "pics or gtfo".
This is a playboy thread, take the serious stuff elsewhere till we see the entire shoot.
lolserious stuff