In North America, there is a distinction between a "resume" and a "CV".
As Maguspk pointed out a CV is something limited usually to academia, or people who have been academics. Typically, from my understanding at least, the distinguishing feature of a CV is that it will include any and all articles, papers, etc. that you have published and indicate which have been peer reviewed. Also you typically include all your past teaching experience. This usually makes them quite long. My mother, who has a PhD and has worked as a grade school teacher (taught HomeEc before doing her Masters and PhD while she supported my dad while he did his PhD hah), a senior bureaucrat, VP in an IT company, and a prof. at a university has a CV that's about 10 or 12 pages long. That's not uncommon for someone in their 50s or 60s with a long career behind them.
Resume's on the other hand are the short document briefly describing experience, skills, and other qualifications. I can't imagine anyone in North America thinking that a resume and a curriculum vitae are the same thing.
Depending on where you're looking for work there may be a distinction between "skills" and "competencies". I'm currently looking for work with my Provincial Government and they're big on competencies - which is good for me since I believe I possess some good skills and competencies, but not years of experience. Competencies are a set of defined (at least by my prov. gov't but theirs is a good guide) qualities that fall outside the realm of skills and experience. They are your soft skills that are part of everything you do in your work, including your technical abilities. If a prospective employer talks about competencies, take time to learn what they are and highlight ones that fit your background and personality and are required by the job.
Oh, and here's a sneaky trick to try if you submit stuff electronically; though it really works best if you submit a PDF file as opposed to a Word document. In the header, footer, or wherever you have some blank space, type in key words that the job posting asks for like certain skills or qualities. Then colour that text white so it doesn't show against the white background. Many large employers use programs to scan digital resume files and "score" them according to how many key words associated with a position are included in the file. This way you can increase your chances of getting past an initial screening if that organization uses a first-step resume screening process.
So, after all this talk I thought I would put up (but probably not shut up) and post my resume, sans private info. I can honestly say there's probably a lot that could be done to this but this is my stock base resume I work from and adapt to specific positions. For reference, I'm looking for work as a research officer, policy analyst, programs analyst, or communications officer and I think the information generally indicates that - though as I said I do highlight or omit certain skills, competencies, and experiences based on the position.
Honestly, I would love any critical feedback anyone has on these, particulairly from people who do hiring. Experiences from those who are doing hiring work now is so valuable, I would be happy for the feedback.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6.../BGResume1.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6.../BGResume2.jpg
XI Wiki


