
Originally Posted by
ringthree
No, you are operating on a baseless assumption. You think that because some people knew about it for a long time then SE must have known about it for a long time.
I have already gone over this several times but there is little evidence to support this notion.
1. From the time that the dupe became widespread knowledge to the time of the fix and then the bans was relatively short. I knew about the dupe about 48 hours before it was removed, then the bans came about a month later.
2. Signal to noise ratio. My assumption is that SE gets a lot of things from their online suggestion box, and the amount of crap compared to the amount of useful information is likely very unbalanced. So even if there were random reports of the dupe it doesn't mean that it got through, and even if it got through, if they didn't include some way for SE to figure what it was or how it works so they could fix it then it is still useless information.
I guess defending SE makes me some kind of apologist. I just thinking beating up on a face-less, evil corporation is relatively stupid. They are just people, and they work like most of the adults here. They have lots of priorities, and even if there is a big problem, if it is not presented to them properly or they don't know the extent of the problem the day to day work of any of those people is be far more important than trying to fix a nebulous and 99% of the time irrelevant problem.
There are far better things to beat up SE about. Lack of communication, lack of information about in-game statistics, lack of information about a huge number of useless pieces of gear, lack of information about development, direction of the game, etc. Lack of new end-game content, lack of new middle-level content, lack of any kind of sense about world destroying bosses, lack of any kind of sense for how to put stats on gear. Constant painting themselves into a corner because of gear stats vs. mob stats.
Those are real legitimate complaints. Whining because SE didn't ban people at the pace that you wanted them to be banned? Give me a break. If you don't want to be banned then don't cheat. If you cheat, except the fact that you have a good chance of being banned. Don't complain after the fact.
The nebulous entity "BG" could have done many things differently. "They" could have said "Hey, there is a dupe, we are taking out the details so more people don't do it, but it's out there and SE needs to do something about it." "They" could have flooded SE with bug reports. "They" could have left the details up and told everyone to flood SE with bug reports.
In the end, "BG" is not at fault for the glitch, and they should not be punished for anything. They even have a lot less blame than far more people that got banned and other actions taken against them. But it is down right re-damn-diculous to suggest that deleting a post to hide the dupe is irrelevant to the discussion when "BG" is saying they did nothing wrong.
How does the PR look when you delete threads to hide the fact that you are duping? Not too many ways to spin that really.
BG is a great place, run by great people. But even great people make bad decisions from time to time. Just own up to them and move on. That's all I am saying.
Sorry for the wall of text.