Anyone LM-17ed this morning?

[Mythe_Seraph]

Ah Chuyu. You and I would be such good friends irl.

Gay.

[_chuchu]

You see, on Seraph, we elephant walk every now and then. Every last one of us.

[Mythe_Seraph]

Not if you're in Apo. We just sit in a corner.

[_chuchu]

lies

[_chuchu]

SE still auto-hammerin for overclocking your pc?

[Kaces]

auto-banhammer commenced today, who got hit!?!!

[Syntex]

From what I heard they changed the ruling on sandworm within the last 48 hours because of our linkshell and the drama that our server has with the damn thing.

[S N K]

From what I heard they changed the ruling on sandworm within the last 48 hours because of our linkshell and the drama that our server has with the damn thing.

What ruling was that?

[Kipling]

SE: banhammur cometh
Seraph: Yess'm massa, undastood

I thoroughly enjoyed reading this little back and forth, I must admit,

[Thorgridson]

Sandworm problems? LIEZ
conspiracy~ Sandworm is cool, dont blame the worm.

[Rilu]

Nothing happens on Unicorn either usually in regards to this LM-17 thing you speak of. Although, I logged on this morning and all my accounts within POL had been erased, so I had to re-register everything like I had just re-installed POL. That was kinda weird and a nuisance, but oh well.

[S N K]

The only thing I can think of in terms of correction in Sandworm is that some GMs in reading the policy didn't understand that Sandworm itself also has a 90 minute rage timer.

I got GM'd by a shell saying we were stalling it by not having a PLD there at the moment with an RDM/NIN tanking it. He then went into a discission with me in tells explaining a "List" as he called it in the GM policy about NMs that GMs will not interfere with.

Of course the "Examples" as the Policy stated listed all the NMs in the game that had gotten rage timers. I tried to tell him that Sandworm also has a rage timer of 90 minutes but he refused to listen.

I finally got fed up and contacted an SGM the next day and told him that this normal GM was wrong for harassing us. All he said was he was going to talk to his superiors *whoever that is* and see about getting the policy changed on Sandworm since SE did put a rage timer on it.

Stupid people are stupid honestly.

Edit: HOLY SHIT THEY ACTUALLY LISTENED TO ME!!

https://secure.playonline.com/polapp...6polg_loc%3Den

However, in August 2005 we introduced a counter-measure to excessive monster holding by making specific monsters more powerful after a certain amount of time has passed. GMs will no longer interfere with these particular monsters. Some examples of monsters like this are as follows:

King Arthro / Simurgh / Roc / Serket / Capricious Cassie / Lord of Onzozo / Behemoth / King Behemoth / Adamantoise / Aspidochelone / Fafnir / Nidhogg / Sandworm

Wow afk in shock.....

P.S. Totally taking Credit for this one!! ^-^

[Kurt Cobain]

However, in August 2005 we introduced a counter-measure to excessive monster holding by making specific monsters more powerful after a certain amount of time has passed. GMs will no longer interfere with these particular monsters. Some examples of monsters like this are as follows:

King Arthro / Simurgh / Roc / Serket / Capricious Cassie / Lord of Onzozo / Behemoth / King Behemoth / Adamantoise / Aspidochelone / Fafnir / Nidhogg / Sandworm

http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/132/delorean1.png

[Khalil]

I honestly don't understand the 90min rage timer on Sandworm. He's wayyyy easier than Fafnir yet needs an extra 30mins to rage? This is a bit stupid on SE's part.

[Seraph]

I honestly don't understand the 90min rage timer on Sandworm. He's wayyyy easier than Fafnir yet needs an extra 30mins to rage? This is a bit stupid on SE's part.

I'll assume it's because Sandworm doesn't pop in the same 10' x 10' room every time. The 30 minutes is probably added as buffer time in between a claim and actually getting people there.

[S N K]

I'll assume it's because Sandworm doesn't pop in the same 10' x 10' room every time. The 30 minutes is probably added as buffer time in between a claim and actually getting people there.

That's pretty much a good and viable reason.

P.S. Lord of Onzozo should be off that list because nobody cares about him anymore. At least sane people.

[Khalil]

I'll assume it's because Sandworm doesn't pop in the same 10' x 10' room every time. The 30 minutes is probably added as buffer time in between a claim and actually getting people there.

I guess.

[sleekmotorwurkz]

I honestly don't understand the 90min rage timer on Sandworm. He's wayyyy easier than Fafnir yet needs an extra 30mins to rage? This is a bit stupid on SE's part.

I dont see anything on that list that should even be longer then 30 min.

[dejet]

I dont see anything on that list that should even be longer then 30 min.

and kirin should be put on a 10min rage timer right!?

Just hush, some shells cant kill it that fast.(mine being one, sometimes 20min kill >.> others 40min and our 1st 52 i think lol?)

1hr to kill a NM that use to take 1hr+ at times is fair in my book. Maybe adman should be put down to 20min and behemoth 20min and maybe faf 45min(being a "NQ") but the rest for kings are all fair...

Now if you said khim and cerb and tia should get a rage timer, then i am on your side.

rage time was put in place, not to stop newer shells or shells with less people from killing, but to keep shells from holding it to keep it in their time zone. People just jump on saying "should not take this long!" ok maybe not, but they are not there to keep weaker shells from killing.

[KSDI]

and kirin should be put on a 10min rage timer right!?

Just hush, some shells cant kill it that fast.(mine being one, sometimes 20min kill >.> others 40min and our 1st 52 i think lol?)

the ls site in your sig is "thezergls.com"

i found that funny