Item Search
     
BG-Wiki Search

View Poll Results: Would this be a good idea?

Voters
367. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, this is a good idea

    157 42.78%
  • No, this idea would not work at all

    87 23.71%
  • This would work to an extent

    123 33.51%
Page 6 of 17 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 16 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 333
  1. #101
    Sandworm Swallows
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,328
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Eanae View Post
    So you turn claiming into a more RNG game then it already is?

    "Wahhhh our ls was stunned longer then theirs. Wahhhhhh."
    Coming from you this is probably because you just didn't want to waste the money you already paid for your bots.

    Seriously, go die in a fire.

  2. #102
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,822
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut
    Blog Entries
    3

    voted no.
    the problem is the people not the game.

  3. #103
    Sandworm Swallows
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,328
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Eanae View Post
    This thread has reached new levels of fail.



    ^ Also this.
    Yeah, it's bot or GTFO! The Eanae way!

  4. #104
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    9,727
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Because 21-24hr mobs are COOL.

  5. #105
    CoP Dynamis
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    265
    BG Level
    4
    FFXI Server
    Caitsith

    While this idea may slightly increase a non-botting claimers chance, bots would still have the upper hand. And to the "just ban the botters" idea, the only way this would be possible is if SE made a PunkBuster like thing, that has to be run along side the game to detect "illegal" processes running on the system, this won't happen as it would cost a lot and would greatly inconvenience players for awhile until SE adapted it for the player bases use of .dat mods, plugins, 3rd party programs like ApRader/Parsers/etc. that interact directly with the client.

    HNMs are fine the way they are, if you can't stand being a Zone for 3hrs just to lose claim then don't do it. Sure playing a game without botters would be great, I just don't see SE doing anything that'll counteract them, properly.

  6. #106
    New Spam Forum
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    165
    BG Level
    3

    Solution: ==warcup== makes you invincible.

  7. #107
    New Merits
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    210
    BG Level
    4
    FFXI Server
    Ragnarok

    Quote Originally Posted by Finalwolf
    spawning with a move similar to Odin's Zantetsuken, that would kill those claim bots.
    lol, /kneel on pop time, would be hilarious

  8. #108
    New Merits
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    246
    BG Level
    4

    On pop that image pops up what is used on forums to make accounts. So like a word hidden in an image, then who ever can /say it the fastest gets the claim

  9. #109
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    9,727
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Post the cracked bot or shut the fuck up and get out.

  10. #110
    New Merits
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    214
    BG Level
    4

    without delayed claiming rules, JP's and those with better pings to ff servers would have an advantage

  11. #111
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    9,727
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Make Faf pop anywhere in the boyhada tree, make KB pop anywhere in qufim, make Aspippop anywhere in terrigan. Solved.

  12. #112
    Sea Torques
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    716
    BG Level
    5
    FFXI Server
    Quetzalcoatl

    The only problem I see with this is that there's a limit to how many people 1 spell can affect. You see this when you get a really crowded Nihogg, you could be standing right next to the mob and not get affected by hurricane wing. I assume it can only hit something like 64 players at a time.

    Having random pop mobs is neat, things like the 3 kings, wyrms, and other mobs like Ixion, Worm, and the TAU mobs adds variety. Making these ??? pops would be kinda lame, affecting the ways you can claim to truly randomize which LS gets the mob is the way to go, and spawning with a AoE stun + Mild Damage is a really good way to go. It relies on who gets unstuned first, and kills of all those low level mules there to claim.

    On another note, I wouldn't be too surprised if the naysayers/bashers in this thread rely on bots to play the game. It always amused me when people feel they have to cheat in order to play. Its like they gave up, instead of actually playing, they just use a bot and watch the game instead. If that's what you've reduced yourself to, just go watch tv instead... Congratulations you got your stuff, but you didn't earn it, and yet you find the ego to say that people that make threads like these are stupid. That's like a serial rapist thinking thier awesome because they can get laid any tine they want... We're all nerds playing a game, and the game ain't real life. But in the end, when you walk away, are you a cheat and a liar? Or are you a person of intergrity and patience?

  13. #113
    Space Pope
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    361
    BG Level
    4
    FFXI Server
    Diabolos

    Quote Originally Posted by Kilorilo View Post
    While this idea may slightly increase a non-botting claimers chance, bots would still have the upper hand. And to the "just ban the botters" idea, the only way this would be possible is if SE made a PunkBuster like thing, that has to be run along side the game to detect "illegal" processes running on the system, this won't happen as it would cost a lot and would greatly inconvenience players for awhile until SE adapted it for the player bases use of .dat mods, plugins, 3rd party programs like ApRader/Parsers/etc. that interact directly with the client.

    HNMs are fine the way they are, if you can't stand being a Zone for 3hrs just to lose claim then don't do it. Sure playing a game without botters would be great, I just don't see SE doing anything that'll counteract them, properly.
    ^ I think this has a portion of the correct solution. Integrate Anti-Cheat software into FFXI, with a zero-tolerance strategy towards detection and banning of new bots as they appear. Make the risk too great for people to use bots. Right now? There's no risk to using a bot so people use them.

  14. #114
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    9,727
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    SE should just make Fafnir pop underground where you can't manually target him, and anyone that attempts anything on it, gets warped to mordion gaol and get the b&.

  15. #115
    New Merits
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    246
    BG Level
    4

    Quote Originally Posted by Tricen View Post
    Post the cracked bot or shut the fuck up and get out.
    There are some people not willing to give it to that is why asked people to PM me. You have not PMed me so stfu bitch

  16. #116
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    9,727
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    SMD AND CONTINUE TO SHUT THE FUCK UP.

    EDIT: I also don't want to have my account stolen, thanks.

  17. #117
    DAKPluto
    Guest

    Give GMs the ability to spawn themselves with Fafhogg ID and everyone that attempts an action on the GM = instant perma-ban.


    I think on Cerberus 4 people would be left....

  18. #118
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    9,727
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    You mean Alexander <_<.

  19. #119
    Falcom is better than SE. Change my mind.
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    17,291
    BG Level
    9

    Quote Originally Posted by Uryuu View Post
    They won't do any of this, hope you guys realize that. Changing Ulli and some other NM's is one thing, they won't mess with king camps. The claim delay stuff was the most they will do.
    If RMT started to dominate kings then SE would probably fix it. Since that's the leading reason they adjusted Despot and Ulli in sky then the money NMs (Archer King, O.Kote, Siren Hair NMs in SSG, etc.)

    Like I said, forced pops can work. But you need to do it where you can only limit a LS doing it so many times. I was thinking of a system where you get the pop item from a BCNM and the entry rules would be like an avatar battle where everyone would need the key item to enter. And you can only attempt the BCNM 3 times per conquest talley.

    I believe a system like this it'd work with some tweaking, mainly abjurations since if they kept drops the same ppl would be spamming the f*ck out of Fafnir.

  20. #120
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    9,727
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    You do realize the RMTers are the playerbase selling gil? At least that's what it seems like. I barely see RMTs anywhere.

Page 6 of 17 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 16 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Solution to the Peace for the Spirit redoing AF issue.
    By Salvager in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2008-09-23, 08:44
  2. Critical community discussion: The solution to RMT
    By SinkingShip in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2006-09-24, 04:39
  3. A (possible)way to beat AV (thinking outside the box)
    By Meggido in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 2005-11-28, 07:30
  4. A question to the blue..
    By Keftenk in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2004-07-29, 01:23