Why would you want to 6-hit with a Ragnarok when a 7-hit Ragnarok gets TP faster than a 6-hit (insert any weapon besides GKT)?
Why would you want to 6-hit with a Ragnarok when a 7-hit Ragnarok gets TP faster than a 6-hit (insert any weapon besides GKT)?
I did the math on it. It's faster than Naglering when you factor in the hitrate cap of 95%. Naglering is a tad bit faster assuming perfect hitrate. However, why the hell would you? Ragnarok honestly isn't that bad of a weapon for DRK on harder stuff, what's with the pDIF-boosting stuff (crits, Spinning Slash).
Well, yes, you're right, but if you could get a 6-hit without giving up anything too important, why wouldn't you?
That being said, you can't, but still.
Absolutely unreasonable, yeah. "6-hit" isn't some magical fucking wonderthing that solves puzzles and cures AIDS. A better phrase would be "appropriate x-hit"; for instance, 5-hit Ebow RNG/SAM, 6-hit Hagun SAM, 7-hit Love Halberd SAM, 20-hit THF.
Jpeg - Phoenix - Apocalypse
http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/3...1030182042.png
I find it pretty hilarious that right after Nevex's post, someone posts a picture of a DRK with an Apoc.
Grats to Jpeg.
Galka representin.
http://www.hezzel.net/ffxi_2009.10.31_02.01.17.png
grats nukka.
Wtf I thought he was working on Aegis. Grats regardless Spruck.
I'm pretty interested in that shout conversation.
Assuming Hades hasn't changed much in the past few months, no, you really aren't.
yyyyyyyyyy xcalllllllll beforeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee aegisssssssssss
Because aegis is useless and excal isn't?
Useless is abit of a strong word for Aegis.
I was Spruck's WHM many times when I still played. He was perfectly fine tanking without Aegis. It helps for some things but really, not necessary if you're good.