
Originally Posted by
Shinryuu
Yes, but that's saying every melee with a crit WS should use claymore. Obviously, none of them are, and it's got a reason.
Ok, Claymore v. Pole. I've done this at least 3 times before, but whatever, I totally need to be more constructive.
pDIF of 1: crit +3% increases damage by 3% (100% damage increase from pDIF+1 on 3% of your swings: same for WS. Like, exactly the same, considering DRG doesn't have Mighty Strikes).
Pole increases damage by ~2% through an increase in swings, WS frequency, and WS damage. The odds of DA'ing more than twice through the pole grip on DB (which is an impossibility), and the slightly less-than-2% increase in swings if you have brutal cancel out the increase in WS frequency, so say it's roughly 2%.
pDIF of 2: crit+3% now increases damage by 50% 3% of the time. Therefore: 1.5% increase in damage. The cutoff point is a pDIF of 1.5: 2% for both.
Carry claymore and pole grips, fin.
Also, I thought the pDIF graph was Araelus', my bad. Crit graph is mine, and the input came from critical hit tests from way back.