I have been thinking...

[VZX]

1. Probably "corrected ratio" is really a bad naming for a variable. We should just call "adjusted ratio" (aRatio) from now on.

2. A real question, directed for RNGs who /WAR and eat meat on endgame events (outside cities dynamis, non-boss limbus and non-boss salvage):
Do you have a parse of your ranged hit rate? how does it compare to your slugwinder hit rate? How much more acc you load from TP->WS? At what TP you release your WS at?

Silly questions, I know; But I wanna know if people just bullshiting or they have solid fact on what they are saying.

[Shinryuu]

dLVL ->

[Tubbers]

There's nothing wrong with corrected ratio.

[midguardian]

Do you have a parse of your ranged hit rate? how does it compare to your slugwinder hit rate? How much more or less acc you load from TP->WS? At what TP you release your WS at?.

Seconded. (And I "adjusted" your quote.)

[VZX]

No, I didn't mean to ask your rough total racc.

"Corrected" sounds like something is incorrect (well, semantically, it's not incorrect). It's just an intermediate number, that is correct, which need to be adjusted in order to get a proper value

[Tubbers]

"Corrected" sounds like something is incorrect. It's just an intermediate number which need[s] to be adjusted in order to get a proper value.

Yeah, not seeing what's wrong with 'corrected'. There is little if any semantic difference between something which needs to be adjusted to be proper, and something that needs to be corrected to be, well, correct.

Also 'c' looks so much better than 'a'.