
Originally Posted by
Beckwin
I kinda think the sentiment expressed in the OP (and subsequently echoed by others) is.... well, it's the easiest "opinion" to have basically. By simply jumping behind something pre-established, i.e. traditional, you can avoid putting effort into developing your own tastes and opinions on the subject and simply point to popular sentiments that have stood some minor test of time. It's a very safe thing to do, and I guess I understand the motivations.
To draw an analogy, let's say you'd like to have an opinion on visual art but don't really have much to go on. You've seen some, of course, and some kinds more than others- classics are something everyone is exposed to, probably more than any other "genre" as a layperson/casual fan. Viewing and understanding other visual art is more difficult and requires some effort (and hey, you really do like those Michaelangelo prints your folks have in the house, and that's ok)... so an easy reaction is to fortify yourself among the classics and deride anything new. It's basically the same thing with music: it's very easy to rely on what's popularly accepted as good, and stuff you grew up listening to: Dad's classic rock collection; the early 90's rap you listened to at middle school dances. And not all of that stuff is bad by any means; in fact a lot of it is rather good (and pretty easy to discuss/"defend" without having to reference time at all). But at the end of the day, you still can't discuss music all that well and you're gonna find yourself stuck with a very limited playlist.
But even so, hiding behind it with a statement of "new stuff sux" is just too easy, and the only one you're hurting is yourself. We're in an era where thanks to technology and communications, we have unparalled access to music for listening and the means to make it are varied, available, and cheap. You can rock a house with some old game boys and a PA system, and then upload the recording you made on your laptop the next day. record labels and physical media distribution are becoming less necessary, and smaller labels are still doing well because they form more intimate relationships with fans and bands. There's a lot of stuff being made, and a portion of it is quite good, which means you're closing yourself off from it just because it's easy to do. Like classic, hard rock such as Zep, Hendrix, Thin Lizzy, etc? You should check out Wolfmother or Crystal Antlers. Like singer/songwriter stuff like Simon & Garfunkel? Look at Ryan Adams and Conor Oberst. Have a thing for classics and compositions? You might enjoy Sigur Ros or something more instrumental, like EiTS. Leonard Cohen fan? You should try listening to The National. Fan of old-school hip-hop? Try Cool Kids. Metal fan? I kinda hate most metal, but as others have mentioned, there's good metal out there today.
I really do understand where it comes from though. I was on a similar boat for awhile in high school (omg classic rock = teh bestest evar). It's also the first and easiest rejection of the shit that dominated the radio and MTV a young person can make. But man, I'm fucking glad I jumped that ship; there's a ton of good music and shows I would've missed out on.