what i think is funny is how ppl will talk about how close war drk and sam are... bitching about how its so close and thus no reason NOT to invite them.... However place a different job that the person isnt and its back to "no that job sucs!"
i smell so much hypocrisy here its sic. Seriously..... Sam overall is best dd merits, just that simple get over it. They can mitigate dmg without having to really hurt their output, Whereas a drk or war to keep up has to sub sam and hasso fulltime. Hell if you want to get down to it mnk/war will probably out do them too, but you dont see people ever talk about that because its impractical, same as SE on drk in xp and /sam full timing hasso on war and drk. xp/hr is the key and that takes defense too.
Having a good pup in party wont lower xp, but Im not going to see any one of you inv me on that, but sure as hell will see you inv my sam without a second thought. I always get asked why i party on mnk and not my sam nowadays, and i tell people i can do more without costing more mp, and thats hard to grasp....
drks king of zerg, sam of xp, blm of hnm, brd of invites..... Yes all jobs can come close to eachother but people are not going to start inviting thfs to birds, pups to mmjsp (blm auto = insta #1 in parse if smart) because sam's are always looking for a pty and a suc sam is still going to do decent dmg compared to another suc dd....
if you expect a pty chance as equal as that of a sam,war,brd,cor,rdm and your not one of them you need to consider this. Would you inv a job that isnt the cookie cutter top merit job? If the answer is "no i will not inv a pup/mnk/thf/bst/blu/nin/etc...." then you sir deserve no inv too on a non cookie cutter dd job, which drk is not.
this is not just directed at you raen but all the people i see complain about how the job they love is not chosen over the cookie cutter job....
XI Wiki



