Item Search
     
BG-Wiki Search
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 64
  1. #21
    A. Body
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,003
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Cerberus

    Thought there was data that it was better than Destroyers?

  2. #22
    Human Being
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,169
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by ringthree View Post
    Was there any proof that these were better than Destroyers? Like any parses or anything?
    No, none publically released.

  3. #23
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    372
    BG Level
    4

    Did this Issue mean that the augment was not working properly in a good way (buff), or that they made it too powerful which in a bad way (nerf).

    I wanted to start spamming this but I kept getting the delay augment lower then -25% and with a lack of other augments on it.
    I still want to spam this for the imperial ingots with 6 ppl. If I pay all 6 of them not including paying myself, the ingots would still be way cheaper then buying them from the AH in a sense.
    900k divided by 6 ppl. Divided by 5 not including myself and I just brought the ingot off of them for 750k.
    I wanted these h2h though and completely forgot about mythic and almost relic once I seen these. Someone use their h2h and tell us if it can still outparse destroyers. (If it even could before the update).

    I know it can't beat relic of course, but I would still use faiths and these because attacking fast is fun as hell even if the damage isn't the highest.

  4. #24
    A. Body
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,003
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Cerberus

    Known values:

    Weapon: +122 delay

    Pup @75 base delay: 360
    Mnk @75 base delay: 300

    -17% delay weapon on mnk: 5.0 TP per hit
    -19% delay weapon on mnk: 4.9 TP per hit
    -24% delay weapon on mnk: 4.8 TP per hit

    -25% delay weapon on pup: 5.3 TP per hit


    Delay for:
    4.8 TP per hit: 156-167 per punch, 312-335 combined
    4.9 TP per hit: 168-179 per punch, 336-359 combined
    5.0 TP per hit: 180-184 per punch, 360-369 combined
    5.1 TP per hit: 185-188 per punch, 370-377 combined
    5.2 TP per hit: 189-192 per punch, 378-385 combined
    5.3 TP per hit: 193-196 per punch, 386-393 combined



    What the results must be:

    482 -25% >> 386-393
    422 -24% >> 312-335
    422 -19% >> 336-359
    422 -17% >> 360-369


    Simple percentile reductions:

    482 -25% = 362 [not valid]
    422 -24% = 321 [valid]
    422 -19% = 342 [valid]
    422 -17% = 350 [not valid]


    Inverse scaling:

    482 / 1.25 = 386 [valid]
    422 / 1.24 = 340 [not valid]
    422 / 1.19 = 355 [valid]
    422 / 1.17 = 361 [valid]


    The 19% value ends up being valid using either method. The remaining values are valid in only one of the two configs.


    Quantity range removed:

    482 > 386-393 == 89-96
    422 > 312-335 == 87-110
    422 > 336-359 == 63-86
    422 > 360-369 == 53-62

    Range removed divided by delay value:

    89-96 / .25 = 356-384
    87-110 / .24 = 363-459
    63-86 / .19 = 332-453
    53-62 / .17 = 312-365


    The only range of values that fit all 4 of the above are 363-365. It's also interesting the that the pup value range is so close to the mnks' value ranges. From that, I'm going to propose a hypothesis.


    Hypothesis:

    The -delay value has a cap of the base delay of the weapon that it can apply to. This cap is at 180 per weapon, or 360 for combined delay on H2H (or possibly just 360 total delay, period). So:

    Mnk:
    Base + weapon = 422, over 360 cap. Delay reduction is calculated on 360 and subtracted from 422.

    17%:
    360 * .17 = 61.2
    422 - 61.2 = 360.8 => 360
    TP per hit: 5.0
    [matches]

    19%:
    360 * .19 = 68.4
    422 - 68.4 = 353.6 => 353
    TP per hit: 4.9
    [matches]

    24%:
    360 * .24 = 86.4
    422 - 86.4 = 335.6 => 335
    TP per hit: 4.8
    [matches]

    25% (pup):
    360 * .25 = 90
    482 - 90 = 392
    TP per hit: 5.3
    [matches]



    Matches all 4 currently known cases.

    Possible secondary validation:

    If any of those with the weapon can delevel to 74 to retest, the predicted TP per hit would be:

    -17% (mnk): 5.2
    -19% (mnk): 5.1
    -24% (mnk): 4.9
    -25% (mnk): 4.9
    -17% (pup): 5.9
    -19% (pup): 5.8
    -24% (pup): 5.6
    -25% (pup): 5.6




    If this is the way that this augment is calculated, then the full -25% delay version would have a final delay of 332 on mnk, and may possibly be compared/verified with FRAPSing vs Lynx Baghnakhs.

    Adjusting the numbers I used on page 2, that would put these at 5.4% above Destroyers, fully on par with Faiths. Any other augments (eg: +2 acc, as I've seen reported) would push them a bit above Faiths.
    from here Allakhazam.com: Final Fantasy XI


    Not like it matters anymore anyway...

  5. #25
    Sandworm Swallows
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,328
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Meian View Post
    from here Allakhazam.com: Final Fantasy XI[/url]


    Not like it matters anymore anyway...
    That was handled in the other thread. The math is pretty bad and makes a lot of assumptions, as they did with Faith's too.

    I still have not seem evidence, theoretical or parsed that Faith or these Manoples are better than Destroyers.

  6. #26
    Sandworm Swallows
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,328
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Gtype954 View Post
    Did this Issue mean that the augment was not working properly in a good way (buff), or that they made it too powerful which in a bad way (nerf).

    I wanted to start spamming this but I kept getting the delay augment lower then -25% and with a lack of other augments on it.
    I still want to spam this for the imperial ingots with 6 ppl. If I pay all 6 of them not including paying myself, the ingots would still be way cheaper then buying them from the AH in a sense.
    900k divided by 6 ppl. Divided by 5 not including myself and I just brought the ingot off of them for 750k.
    I wanted these h2h though and completely forgot about mythic and almost relic once I seen these. Someone use their h2h and tell us if it can still outparse destroyers. (If it even could before the update).

    I know it can't beat relic of course, but I would still use faiths and these because attacking fast is fun as hell even if the damage isn't the highest.
    Edit: Oops. Posted before reading fully.

  7. #27
    Sandworm Swallows
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,328
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Malacite View Post
    Awesome. Our dev team once more shows it's true intelligence (or lack thereof @-@)
    How so?

  8. #28
    I'm more gentle than I look.
    Mr. Feathers AKA Mr. Striations
    All hail Lord Yamcha

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,539
    BG Level
    9

    Quote Originally Posted by ringthree View Post
    That was handled in the other thread. The math is pretty bad and makes a lot of assumptions, as they did with Faith's too.
    I did what i call using practical parse data. I went to one of my parses, grabbed my dmg/hit average and dmg/crit avearge. Then i took the delay of both (using the 317 figure) and was like in 100 attack rounds of destroyers I'd get X number of attack rounds with Manoples, found X and plugged in # of hits for both (using same acc so just -25% delay before the other stats) and then applied crit rates and Manoples came out on top assuming they were both dmg 18 (which manoples are dmg 20 and can also get 3 acc).

  9. #29
    Old Merits
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,151
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Leviathan

    Ringthree is a Ridill poster now.

  10. #30
    Sandworm Swallows
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,328
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Ultimagi View Post
    Ringthree is a Ridill poster now.
    I know. LOL I am the worst about that. It even bugs me too. I post before reading the whole thread because it better follows my train of thought. I am about to do it again.

  11. #31
    Cerberus
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    421
    BG Level
    4
    FFXI Server
    Alexander

    While I would love to see some buffs added for Hand to Hand and Single Hand wpn melee in general, I don't think the fix all should be some absurdly broken weapon from an ANNM (and imo, yes 25% off your total delay is broken, not to mention the counter and acc possible buffs.) You are basically getting a wpn very close to being on par with fully upgraded relic/ PW drop that takes a good 15 minutes and some luck to obtain.

    As Francisco mentioned, this felt too much like slumming it to me. I even told my ANNM group I wasn't too worried about getting these because they seemed too good to be true (and SE doesn't exactly have a track record of having things that are too good to be true stick around for very long >_>)

  12. #32
    Can you spare some gil?
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    8,777
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Francisco View Post
    Accuracy +2 Counter +4 Delay +25% .
    Fixed to accommodate the new changes to come to the weapon, expect to see this.

  13. #33
    Who's driving? Oh my God Bear is driving! How can that be??
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    5,882
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Lakshmi

    I had thought it was strange that the -delay took the delay from 360 or 180 and then took that amount and subtracted it from the total delay of the weapon (Or weapon + base delay on h2h). Now it will probably reflect what it should have, which was -delay from the weapon itself meaning those -25% on those H2H weapons will be around 91 Delay.

  14. #34
    Black Belt
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    5,772
    BG Level
    8

    blah, guess I'd have to get that goddamn destroyers after all...

  15. #35
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,270
    BG Level
    6

    Balrahn : totally punk'd you, bro. rofl

  16. #36
    BRP
    BRP is offline
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    15,019
    BG Level
    9

    SE should just break everything in this game and make all the stats reach infinity, then the playerbase will be happy.

  17. #37
    Sea Torques
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    548
    BG Level
    5
    FFXI Server
    Cerberus

    Why even put the chance of -25% delay on a h2h weapon in the game, if theyre just gonna take it out?

    Christ they dont think before they do half the shit they do....fuckin bizzare

  18. #38
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Shiva

    Quote Originally Posted by BRP View Post
    SE should just break everything in this game and make all the stats reach infinity, then the playerbase will be happy.
    Not if it benefits SAM!

  19. #39
    Sandworm Swallows
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,328
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Zilong View Post
    blah, guess I'd have to get that goddamn destroyers after all...
    Destroyers are very easy to get. Hell, all the Crit hit weapons are easy to get.

  20. #40
    Sandworm Swallows
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,328
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by BRP View Post
    SE should just break everything in this game and make all the stats reach infinity, then the playerbase will be happy.
    No, they would complain that SE has limited reality to infinity and will demand interdimensional gear.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Current Known Issue (May 16)
    By sruon in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 2009-05-18, 10:12
  2. Current Known Issues (Nov. 6)
    By Khalil in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 2007-11-13, 17:51
  3. Current Known Issues (Aug. 30)
    By Khalil in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 400
    Last Post: 2007-09-04, 09:20
  4. Current Known Issues (Aug. 29)
    By Reality in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 2007-08-30, 18:38
  5. Current Known Issues (Jun. 8, 2007)
    By Lordwafik in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 129
    Last Post: 2007-06-13, 06:26
  6. Current Known Issues (Mar. 8)
    By Fhqwghads in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 181
    Last Post: 2007-03-15, 14:19
  7. Details on Current Known Issue (Jul. 25)
    By Mekami in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 2006-07-25, 20:07
  8. Details on Current Known Issues (no fix for RNGs, sorry...)
    By layoneil in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2005-07-21, 12:53