They must be a psychosis inducing narcoticNot only has a regular diet of cheerios made me healthier, now I no longer fear death.
They must be a psychosis inducing narcoticNot only has a regular diet of cheerios made me healthier, now I no longer fear death.
Yes, how dare the FDA/Obama/whoever want people to not be misled when it comes to their health -- those Commie bastards.
The problem isn't the health tips. It's ok to say cheerios is healthier than bacon. But when you make up a sciency-sounding statistic like "lowers your cholesterol by 4% in 6 weeks" you MUST have done something to back up that contention. My assumption, seeing the adds, was that they did a shitty comparison of cheerios vs. terrible-diet breakfast which would have been misleading but not outright deceit when looking at the fine print. They didn't even do that much.
With cholesterol so much on the public radar, and fad diets/supplements all the rage, the statement by general mills reeks of intent to deceive.
Taken down now, and replaced with a click-through screen that asserts even more strongly that Cheerios lowers your cholesterol. There's also a gigantic banner on the box saying "Clinically PROVEN to help reduce cholesterol" over a heart-shaped bowl of Cheerios.Originally Posted by Cheerios Website
Against all this though, not going to lie Honey-nut Cheerios are awesome.
Didn't see it in OP article and it seems to be skirted around in the posts. Maybe it was mentioned, I just skimmed. The FDA wanting to label Cheerios as a drug is what started this all. I guess that means we'll need a prescription to buy it.
General Mills, Inc., Warning Letter
Based on claims made on your product's label, we have determined that your Cheerios® Toasted Whole Grain Oat Cereal is promoted for conditions that cause it to be a drug because the product is intended for use in the prevention, mitigation, and treatment of disease. Specifically, your Cheerios® product bears the following claims ort its label:
I can't believe they are trying to say Cheerios is what lowers your cholesterol. Isn't it... the not eating cholesterol that lowers your cholesterol?
just a few quick statements about this topic.
1. lolGOP propaganda
2. I <3 Colin Cowherd
3. Cheerios are da bomb, whether they are honey nut, original, or multigrain
Today's Republican Party - pissing in your Cheerios.
Ok so I didn't remember correctly, I still don't think the infraction was that bad.
1. Eating more fiber can lower cholesterol
2. Cheerios has a good amount of fiber
3. ???
4. Lawsuit
Let's not beat up on positive dietary influences right now.
On the other hand cereals have been known to do this shit. When I was a kid they had somewhere around 70-80% sugar and it was marketed as kid's "energy food". So I could be wrong.
It's interesting that your search for blame stops at the first government agency it finds, which automatically gets blamed for "starting this all" when their action was simply to enforce a rule broken by General Mills. You also attribute the agency with WANTING to label Cheerios as a drug, when it's simply a matter of policy. In your little fantasy world, does the FDA head wake up one morning and go "God damn, I haven't done enough to destroy America in the name of liberal fascism this week, I think I'll force people to get prescriptions to buy Cheerios!"
I think you missed the rest of the letter:
Basically, if Cheerios and their ads would like to continue putting their foot in their mouth, then they can apply that Cheerios is a new drug. If the FDA approves them (which they wouldn't), then they can continue to make such (retarded) claims and then yes you can get a prescription for your breakfast.These claims indicate that Cheerios® is intended for use in lowering cholesterol, and therefore in preventing, mitigating, and treating the disease hypercholesterolemia. Additionally, the claims indicate that Cheerios® is intended for use in the treatment, mitigation, and prevention of coronary heart disease through, lowering total and "bad" (LDL) cholesterol. Elevated levels of total and LDL cholesterol are a risk factor for coronary heart disease and can be a sign of coronary heart disease. Because of these intended uses, the product is a drug within the meaning of section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321 (g)P)(B)]. The product is also a new drug under section 201(p) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(p)] because it is not generally recognized as safe and effective for use in preventing or treating hypercholesterolemia or coronary heart disease. Therefore,under section 505(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 355(a)], it may not be legally marketed with the above claims in the United States without an approved new drug application.
Or you know, they could stop bullshitting everyone and just say it is healthier than a doughnut.
Basically all the FDA is saying is that General Mills is making an unsubstantiated medical related claim about their product that has not been proven in clinical trials. Since it is a product that the FDA evaluates, all they are asking is that they remove the claim from the box label, since there is no scientific evidence produced by General Mills to back up that claim.
Multigrain >>>> Original >>>> Honey-Nut >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apple-Cinnamon.
Scientifically proven by my mouth.