Of course we can say it's not a black white thing and there are many shades of gray, but after observing what we have observed we only have room to wonder whether the dems are center right or just stupid.
Of course we can say it's not a black white thing and there are many shades of gray, but after observing what we have observed we only have room to wonder whether the dems are center right or just stupid.
I talk to canadians every damn day; by and large they're fans of obama actually.
It's not surprising to me that to you Obama=Democrats.
you're the one who seems to be making that assumption here, being that your original premise was me "voting for the conservative party" when all you know is that I voted for Obama.
You don't vote in congressional elections? lol
No, but seriously, i'm getting the feeling that you're denying that the democrats either have no sense in what they stand for, or they're just a very shitty party.
You know what, maybe it's time we admit it...
If you really support the dems so much, maybe you're just not as liberal as you thought you were. In fact, it's possible you're not really a socialist.
Was being socialist trendy in your old college, becky?
Hey Beck, since you want to be an honorary democrat, here's a site that proves Iran is a danger hence we need to invade, since i know you guys just love you soms invasions, which is totally not what the republicans like.
http://www.mesi.org.uk/DangersMap.aspx
By the way, you're taking a very long time with that reply. If you don't hurry up i'll have to read it tomorrow, and i do so want to read it while it's still hot and wet.
Umm.
Yea, sure.
o, just making sure.
Carry on!
contrary to conservative stereotypes, I'm a socialist with a job. pardon for the delay in responding to your trolling.
again, for the umpteenth time, I support the dems inasmuch that they're the closest to my views of the choices with a chance, and I find that occasionally they make progress in a direction I approve of, compared to the GOP, which is further from my views and basically never makes progress in a direction I approve of.
maybe having a duality of practically applied versus ideological views is too complicated for you to handle... but really just think about it; people do it all the time. You seem very principled about sexual identity and whatnot, yet somehow I don't think that stops you from sympathizing with gay (omg homosexuality isn't real, neither is heterosexuality!) rights movements nor do I think it would stop you from going to a gay bar.
Noam Chomsky is a very principled anarcho/libertarian-socialist, yet he still owns private property- zomg hypocrit! not a real socialist!... not really, some ideas simply don't have the proper environment to truly be realized. I'd hope you'd be able to appreciate that reality.
Don't know why anybody cares about anything Noam Chomsky's done outside of cognitive science and linguistics.
he and howard zinn were the editors of the Pentagon Papers, which blew the cover on the US's actions in not just Vietnam, but Laos and Cambodia.
chomsky's a pretty great historian; oddly it seems that his theories have fallen out of favor in linguistics.
So, ummm, Beckwin, what's the excuse for this one now?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uuWVHT1WUY
haven't watched teh vid yet but your trolling is too obvious by attempting to make me defend every single Obama action as if it were my own.
work on your technique dawg