u lyk dem leaked torture pix amirite?

[Leif]

What the fuck.

This has nothing to do with Gitmo treasonfest (Although the release is putting American troops in danger). In addition, this sham of a news story was published with old 2006 photos and recycled content from Google.

It hasn't even been picked up by the New York Times (And they never waste an opportunity to take a jab at Bush).

[Rhinox]

lol treasonfest


Spoken like a true Mann Coulter disciple.

[Leif]

At least I don't pray to the Obamessiah.

[Rhinox]

Nah you don't thats why you and sean hannity pray to Zombie Regan.

[Leif]

You just keep throwing names at me. Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Ronald Reagan... What's next?

In your list of "bad people" you have a pair of men who potentially saved hundreds of thousands of lives through enhanced interrogation, another man who won the cold war, and conservative commentators who comment on something called "facts" while simultaneously making liberals like you freak out.

You have a president who welcomed 9/11 with open arms by refusing to respond to any attacks against America. While he was doing nothing to help this country, he was sleeping with his intern and raping his secretary.

Maybe you should consider reorganizing your list of bad guys to include people like Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, the USSR, and Khalid Shaikh Mohammed instead of the people who destroyed them and their organizations.

[Correction]

Maybe you should consider reorganizing your list of bad guys to include people like Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, the USSR, and Khalid Shaikh Mohammed instead of the people who destroyed them and their organizations.

Hooray let's name more enemies that don't really exist any longer!

So when will the republican party go after 'bad guys' instead of threatening to filibuster Obama's supreme court nomination before it happens and trying to drum up charges against Nancy Pelosi? You're awfully blind to the bullshit your own side of the fence cheerleads whenever it's time to criticize dah liberulz.

[Rhinox]

You just keep throwing names at me. Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Ronald Reagan... What's next?

In your list of "bad people" you have a pair of men who potentially saved hundreds of thousands of lives through enhanced interrogation, another man who won the cold war, and conservative commentators who comment on something called "facts" while simultaneously making liberals like you freak out.

You have a president who welcomed 9/11 with open arms by refusing to respond to any attacks against America. While he was doing nothing to help this country, he was sleeping with his intern and raping his secretary.

Maybe you should consider reorganizing your list of bad guys to include people like Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, the USSR, and Khalid Shaikh Mohammed instead of the people who destroyed them and their organizations.

Funny how you praise Reagan for winning the cold war when he did nothing of the sort. The Berlin wall and the USSR fell under Papa bush's watch. And the Downfall of the USSR had more to do with Gorbachav being a weak leader But thats not what RRLP would have you believe. The Ronald Reagan Legacy project would have you believe he cured aids by some of the garbage they put out. They totally rewrote history to make him out to be this iconic figure he really wasn't. He only cut taxes in the first year of his presidency the rest of his two terms he ran up the Deficit to 3.5 trillion. But again the RRLP would rewrite history to have him be this fiscally conservative juggernaut he really wasn't. Oh and he also closed down countless Mental health hospitals as governor and as president he cut funding to more.

Funny part is Bush is trying out his Legacy project of his own.

oh and I find it laughable you are accusing Clinton of 9/11 considering it happened under dubbya's watch. Not to mention that his administration got a memo telling them exactly what osama was planning to do. Bush administration only defense to it was "It wasn't specific enough!". Btw bush isn't responsible for saving any lives. as far as I'm concerned he is responsible for the deaths of Thousands of American GI's by taking us to war under false pretenses err I mean bold face lies.

[Churchill]

If you want to blame a person for 9/11, then you would blame Clinton (administration).

If you want to blame something more accurate, then blame him and the last 100 years of US Foreign Policy, and then the American people for accepting that Foreign Policy.

[Colenzo]

obligatory cockmeat sandwich remark

[Rhinox]

If you want to blame a person for 9/11, then you would blame Clinton (administration).

If you want to blame something more accurate, then blame him and the last 100 years of US Foreign Policy, and then the American people for accepting that Foreign Policy.

I rather have the last 100 years of Foriegn policy then the "with us or against us" bullshit foriegn policy under Bush.

[Melchiah]

You just keep throwing names at me. Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Ronald Reagan... What's next?

In your list of "bad people" you have a pair of men who potentially saved hundreds of thousands of lives through enhanced interrogation, another man who won the cold war, and conservative commentators who comment on something called "facts" while simultaneously making liberals like you freak out.

You have a president who welcomed 9/11 with open arms by refusing to respond to any attacks against America. While he was doing nothing to help this country, he was sleeping with his intern and raping his secretary.

Maybe you should consider reorganizing your list of bad guys to include people like Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, the USSR, and Khalid Shaikh Mohammed instead of the people who destroyed them and their organizations.

You're either really stupid, a close-minded Republican fanboy, or are trying to troll. Or a combination of the above.

Enhanced interrogation? Seriously? And do you really think that if word got out(which it is and will) about the specifics of those "enhanced interrogation" techniques that there will not be another 9-11-esque backlash? That should indicate to you that that type of shit is wrong.

As far as Bill Clinton doing nothing to help this country, I'd like to point out that at the end of FY2000, the Clinton Administration's budget managed to bring the national deficit down to $17.91 billion from $281.26 billion in FY1994(which as you surely know, would be the deficit left over from George Sr. and previously Ronald Regan). I'd like to challenge you to show me a conservative president who has accomplished such a feat. Furthermore, Bill Clinton does not give two shits who you sleep with, so why should it matter to you or anyone else who he sleeps with? And as far as I know, Clinton has never been charged with rape.

[Despain]

You're trolling right? please tell me you're trolling so I don't have to call you a retard.

Lol, no.

[Kuya]

I rather have the last 100 years of Foriegn policy then the "with us or against us" bullshit foriegn policy under Bush.

What?

[Rhinox]

What?

Yes that includes our policy on Israel as well. I rather be a cheerleader for Israel then be falsely led into war under False pretenses where thousands of US soldiers die and hundred of thousands of Innocent civilians lost their lives..

[Kuya]

Yes that includes our policy on Israel as well. I rather be a cheerleader for Israel then be falsely led into war under False pretenses where thousands of US soldiers die and hundred of thousands of Innocent civilians lost their lives..

You do realize that the Bush policy is not discontinuous, right? False pretenses had already been used to go to war for Vietnam and Iran-Contra. Furthermore, how can you possibly say that you prefer the foreign policy of the 100 last years and have a straight face? Was the coup the US formulated in Iran more moral to you? What about when the US government destroyed Afghanistan's progressive government, and instead back a group of warlords? Or when the US had a dictator installed in Iran? Or when the US used to support the dictator Saddam? Or when the US used to, and still does, support the oppressive monarchy in Saudi Arabia? Or what about the terror the US has inflicted in Latin America? Does that seem more modest to you when compared to Bush? Does the US overthrowing democratically elected governments in Latin America because they're too leftist and instead installing right wing dictators that massacred thousands sound less extreme to you?

What about the Cuban embargo? Or what the US did to Haiti? Does ravaging Haiti's resources sound less horrible to you? And East Timor? Did that US backed massacre seem somehow seem worse than the invasion of Iraq?

There is no distinction; Bush's attack of Iraq was no different, it was the same damn foreign policy. No more no less. The same kind of terrorizing of the Middle East and Latin America which has created terrorist groups to respond to the US's tyranny. With all the terrorizing, i think the US government is a Predacon, rhinox.

[Brill Weave]

That'll show those cheeky terrorists!

[Vandalhart]

Last I heard, and someone can correct me on this, American Soldiers are in danger wether or not the actual enemy units have seen these pictures or not. Lame excuse is lame.

[Rhinox]

You do realize that the Bush policy is not discontinuous, right? False pretenses had already been used to go to war for Vietnam and Iran-Contra. Furthermore, how can you possibly say that you prefer the foreign policy of the 100 last years and have a straight face? Was the coup the US formulated in Iran more moral to you? What about when the US government destroyed Afghanistan's progressive government, and instead back a group of warlords? Or when the US had a dictator installed in Iran? Or when the US used to support the dictator Saddam? Or when the US used to, and still does, support the oppressive monarchy in Saudi Arabia? Or what about the terror the US has inflicted in Latin America? Does that seem more modest to you when compared to Bush? Does the US overthrowing democratically elected governments in Latin America because they're too leftist and instead installing right wing dictators that massacred thousands sound less extreme to you?

What about the Cuban embargo? Or what the US did to Haiti? Does ravaging Haiti's resources sound less horrible to you? And East Timor? Did that US backed massacre seem somehow seem worse than the invasion of Iraq?

There is no distinction; Bush's attack of Iraq was no different, it was the same damn foreign policy. No more no less. The same kind of terrorizing of the Middle East and Latin America which has created terrorist groups to respond to the US's tyranny. With all the terrorizing, i think the US government is a Predacon, rhinox.

Fair enough. admittedly when I was thinking of the last 100 years was thinking more of Prebush2 and post bush1. although it wasn't perfect in it of it self.

[dejet]

had it coming. bla bla

oh wait...

I live in the US to be cool I have to hate me.

OMFG we did that...

[Abandon]

I believe the exact quote was "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques"

We have a winner.