As a lawyer (if it wasn't obvious), I can appreciate where you all are coming from, and your valid points.
Calling someone an asshole isn't defamation - it's a mere insult. Nor is it possible to recover on grounds of intentional infliction of emotional distress in some cases (in short, sage sundi gets off free).
So it's not as if I don't understand about the roulette theory of birdshittery (some days it shits on you, and some days the guy next to you gets the 'good luck').
Nor am I unfamiliar with the argument of "a slippery slope" (re: grey area, or gray area, depending =p). There's no real need to get in to a true debate on these points, although i would note that SE has already embarked upon the slippery slope with the LM-17 debacle (and other very very early game days glitches; but this would lead to HNMLS drama, which is more advanced than standard =p).
The point here is: There is no grey area in this case.
This is about as cut and dry as it gets. And for all the touting of GM duty to help players resolve problems that they cannot through the game itself, and to make this game more enjoyable (and to prevent player griefing, and scamming [note: why is scamming objectionable? It is a form of theft. Consider how scamming will be rectified by GMs on the basis of objective data, but the instant case will not], which are fundamental precepts of the POL agreement).
Even so, suppose the junior GM (for lack of a better term) went ahead and exercised power to do so - to a certain degree, GM's do have the ability to Confiscate and Return items. In short, to remove and put into inventory items. Would this create Precedent amongst the community?
Nope. I think most of us would simply consider it an outlier, an abnormal occurrence. Moreover, and more importantly, there is absolutely no mechanism by which one GM's actions are at all precedential and therefore BINDING amongst all other GMs - there is no transparency, no reporting, no recording of GM actions (other than what we provide each other).
Moreover, we are already familiar (and even at ease) with GMs acting inconsistently with one another - i'm sure there are some here who remember when it became illegal to hold HNMs, as well as the debacle where (pre ToAU!) two NA hnmls held Fafhogg (one or the other) while a JP ls kept trying to take... eventually there was a wipe, at which point the JP ls took faf, and the NA ls caused a spike flail (epiclols). Correct me if I'm mistaken, but this was before /blockaid, and the jp ls was also curebombing the NA kiters to try to acquire claim. Multiple people from the NA ls were banned and investigated. No one from the JP ls was even reprimanded.
Not merely would this fall under the category of racism, but it is clearly inconsistent action by the GM community; holding of HNMs and NMs continued by the JP community afterwards without punishment, but was expressly forbidden to the NA side.
So frankly, piecemeal, inconsistent decisions by GMs which are not binding on any other GM are, ironically, what we have come to expect (that is to say, consistent).
Lastly, I know many people have said "just go with a static". That presumes a number of things: namely that there are 5 people whom I trust not to dick me over, who are always on at the same time I am, and who are at all interested in saving their tags for doing Nyzul to either get armor themselves, or solely to help me get armor. A great many of my friends have quit this game (or ended up screwing me to get what they wanted) - in fact, instances like this are part of why so many have quit.
As for gathering others and forming a static well: isn't that simply getting together with strangers? That is no different from doing a pick up run. A stranger in a "Static" has every motive to screw you to get what they want, no different from a pick up.
This last bit is what is, to me, the most troubling consequence of what this GM ruling is (especially if it's, perhaps, the one thing they insist on being constant on) - in such a brightline case as this (no contributory fault of the victim [full inventory, accidentally pass, time ran out, etc.], impossible mistake/error, willingness to make amends voluntarily, immediate report to GMs, objective Chatlog evidence, witness testimony by other, unrelated [pure strangers who lost lot themselves and have no incentive to lie] members of the party)...what is the consequence?
1. Stealing is OK. Ninja whatever you want, whatever you can, GMs will neither punish you nor take it away from you.
and worse:
2. You absolutely cannot trust anyone on any server, unless you know them personally. Good luck getting anything in game accomplished, unless you have that many reliable people.
Of course, some LS have been around long enough, have the name and reputable players to not have to worry about either point. But how many new lses do you see springing up all the time? I counted 3 new dyna, 2 new sky, 1 new limbus in the past 2 weeks. Even so, what about new members? There's only so much reasonable precaution players should HAVE to take in the course of have a reasonable modicum of enjoyment in this game.
when ff14 rolls around, I will remember this. I will remember every time a GM has been unhelpful. I will remember every time I got screwed on a drop. I will remember spending hours camping nms, only not to get claim (or to get claim and get nothing). I will remember the alternative, which was spending hours taking photos to pop an nm that didn't drop (or that people stopped showing up to kill). I will remember killing nearly 1000 mobs for gothic gauntlets and still not getting it because the drop rate from chest is less than 5% (and therefore by multiplication...). I'll remember AV and PW. I'll remember "beta testing" all the expansion stuff (and updates) from ToAU and on. I'll remember all the un-fun times I've had because they outnumber the fun times a hundred+ to one. And I'll remember it because it's the same people. Someone will, without fail, say that FF14 is what FF11 should have been; In reality, FF14 will simply be what FF11 was.
Edit: Just wanted to note for MysteriousX: This is, no joke, the 5th time I've lost this armor piece (let alone askar at all), after many many times hitting the floor (or in some incompetent cases, simply trying). However, it is the 1st time I've lost it when it was rightfully mine; that is why I am willing to fight for it, rather than simply roll over and get trampled on. If I'd simply lost the lot legitimately (as in all the other times) then I would simply continue or not, no drama.
XI Wiki



