I don't see why tasing people receives media attention. It's a non-lethal, non-harmful method of subduing someone. It has a very very low probability of causing harm or death, despite the skewed media coverage of every one of those times when it involves the elderly, children, or minorities.
that bitch had it coming
It's non-lethal except for when it's lethal.
Watch the video of the incident...saying she pushed him into traffic or jumped into traffic...is a massive exaggeration.
Water is lethal. Everything is lethal. It's just some things have a lot lower probability of killing you than others.
Speaking of 72 year olds, wheres that article about that 80 year old that killed a cougar with a pocket knife, or the one that fended off some muggers?
Old people aren't all weak, fragile, peacable people!
Well...now we're back to "Well...everyone doesn't die when I shoot them either".
lol nice title edit. Bravo.
Edit: Semantics.
water is lethal... cmmmmaaannnnnn
Such an odd time for this to come up...
The lady that babysat me most of my life is like 97 now, and the last time I talked to her she was still walking a couple miles a day, and did tons of volunteer work, and even worked as a sample giver at Sams sometimes.
At 72, she could definitely have kicked your average fat lazy cop's ass, but would've been no match for one that was in good shape.
And, the reason it's such an odd time for this to come up... is because she goes to the same church Dr. Tiller went to...
lol @ the title change.
Regardless. A struggle would present a lot of variables that could endanger other people on the roads whether you think it would have happened or not.
There's not much difference between a taser death, a drowning, accidentally mixing the wrong meds, getting hit while crossing the street, or having a heart attack on an amusement park ride.
Ok, so there's a difference in the circumstances, but nobody expects a taser death just as nobody expects any of the other deaths. Shit happens. For the majority of people, tasing is just an uncomfortable experience.
In fact, I bet more people die from those other causes than tasing, but I'd just be pulling stats out of my ass at that point. It's still a bet I'd make, though.
It'd never have passed approval as a legal method of subduing someone if it had anything but a negligible fatality rate. Unless you think regulation of this sort of thing is more lax than, say, FDA approvals or other safety-related regulations.