And is "must have" always universal?
And is "must have" always universal?
There's no such thing as a must have game.
What if you need it to breath?
"Must have" appears to imply that you'd be a fucking retard if you disliked the game because all the sheep think it's the second coming of jesus and that everyone should own it, where-as "really good/great" gives the impression a particular title is worth a look at if you ever get the itch for something new to play.
oh and in the case of that PS3 thread you can fill in "Normal quality games" in the title
What would we classify shovelware titles as if a new thread about Wii games surfaces?
Because they are must have games man.
I think I figured it out. If the title has a sequential number in it prior from a previous title, it must be a must-have.
Insomnia | Commentary | On Role-playing Games
I couldn't help but think of you when I started reading this BRP.
Don't click that btw, the site is fucking terrible.
Yes, because I fucking love faggots
He has some really good articles, I love his one about depth/complexity. I even quoted it once here.
though I have no idea why he would call MMORPGs RPG games...
not going to happen, I can't quit Kuya
I find that more often than not people don't know this. Like at all. Treat it like heretic speak. Impossible.I suppose someone out there doesn't know this
For example: People on Bluegartr.
I love people who call other people fags.
EDIT: It should be a science.
I missed you brip