Since the OP's example thread involves me (I'm the 'blogger') I figure I'd give my take on this situation and that particular thread.
There is a very distinct set of people that post mostly standard as opposed to mostly advanced. I feel that what made standard different and more forgiving wasn't necessarily the title or description of the sub-forum, but simply the types of posters who choose to frequent there. Every poster is different and some posters are more forgiving than others.
I'll give you the case of a now-banned poster named "Ahlah". He later returned as the poster "C&O" but none of us knew this until later on when a mod linked the 2 posters by IP after they started sounding too similar. I'm not purposely trying to make fun of him (he's an OK guy imo despite what the forum thinks of him), this is just the best example I can find. Anyways, here are 2 threads involving this player, one from standard and one from advanced.
Advanced
http://www.bluegartr.com/forum/73690...blossom-2.html
Standard
http://www.bluegartr.com/forum/73597...tanking-2.html
In the advanced thread, the question is about Death Blossom's effectiveness on HNMs, specifically Byakko. It almost instantly turns into a drama thread. If I recall correctly, this is the thread that got him banned.
In the standard thread, the question is about RDM/NIN tanking and he is now posting under a new name C&O (but we don't know this at the time). This fails to reach drama status and I feel like this thread is truly one of the best threads you can find on BG regarding endgame RDM tanking mechanics. At the very end, you find another poster, Yarko, who posts some extremely impressive RDM solo tanks on Cerb and Ixion.
The difference here is who's posting in response. In both cases, you have a very volatile poster in Ahlah who's prone to creating drama, but the 2 threads are handled in very different manners. There is really nothing inherently different about these threads other than who is actually responding - and this leads to whether or not a flame war ensues or the chance for good information to come about.
**********************
There is nothing inherently different about the new system vs. the old split advanced/standard system. What makes a thread go into epic flame war status vs. maintaining a semi-intelligent discourse has only to do with who's posting replies. The big question is...
Are advanced readers capable of holding their tongue and being civil?
The old standard frequenters generally were. But by merging the 2 sections, you combine us, and unfortunately, the fact that the standard readers are civil won't prevent flame wars if the advanced posters egg it on. It takes only 2 to start one, and you can't really stop one outside of a mod lock.
**********************
Lastly, there is an awful lot of info BG readers are missing out on because of the perceived attitude BG is known for in the advanced section. There are many lurkers of this forum that have incredibly vital information - information even the most jaded BG vet would die to know - that have told me they won't ever post that sort of info here and would rather just keep it underground because of the response they 'know' or perceive to 'know' they will get. No one wants their topic destroyed, their LS or strategy nitpicked to death, or every little perceived flaw to get laughed at. This isn't being a pussy or having 'sand in the vagina', it's just common sense. Who wants to put forth tremendous effort to share information when they feel they will just get nitpicked and collectively put down?
I find BG still by far the best place for information in this game and to discuss strategy; however, advanced is rarely the section for this now. For me personally, I learn the most from BG via PMs now. I don't post very serious threads openly looking for answers, I just go directly to certain players because we can have the best discussions this way. This doesn't help the average reader or poster though.
I know the mods work incredibly hard, especially Sono and the last thing I'd ever do is openly straight up bash BG forums considering the role it has played in popularizing my own writing; however, I do think things can be improved, and I sense the mods felt this way as well when making this change. I don't have a real practical solution to this, but I do have an idealistic one:
When you post replies on BG, just think are you posting to win an argument (aka to prove yourself more knowledgeable)? Or are you posting to contribute? To me I don't care if I lose the argument as long as it's a good argument. I don't have a problem saying openly "Suiram knows more than me about this", which is largely what stopped the drama in the OP's example thread. There are some posters here who would rather be shot in the arm than lose an argument. That's the problem. I doubt it'll ever be fixed but whatever.
TL;DR Version: QQ
XI Wiki




