Hurrm.
Hurrm.
'kay
It is NOT okay to be as annoying as possible while still operating within the forum rules.
It is NOT ok to harass any moderator for modding a thread. The moderators have been given a guideline on what and how to take care of things. If you feel a moderator is abusing their powers you must contact an admin to discuss this. Any harassing to a moderator will be given to the admins, and we will deal with you appropriately.
http://www.movietrimmer.com/content/...es/40888_3.jpg
Well at least when derails are locked we will know why derails are locked.
ok, call mod sass "mod harassment" and all the sudden being shitty and unassailable for it is cool?
if they called it "mod freedom-hating" I bet they could get a whole coalition on board.
Think an admin would even fucking care?
It's not as if mods ever get seriously sassed individually when the person isn't a mouthbreather or the mod didn't just do a shitty job.
We can still harass them in the sanctity of our Spam home though, right?
WTS temporary vacations
He never said who he was saying that to, so technically he could have said it to a mod. Would that get him b&?
In other news, seeing the rules thread made me realize I miss Nikkei posting.
Didn't even bother to read the rest.I. Future Cases
![]()
Hey guys, the mod team here!
There was a lot of problems with us banning people for no good reason, so we made the rules as loose as possible so we can continue being retarded. By the way, when we say "annoying," we mean "when we feel like it."
Sincerely, Sonomaa.
PS: I am still looking for that special someone. I got a thing for catgirls.
PPS: Guys with convincing makeup are okay too.
PPPS: I'll be the catgirl in the relationship. You know, if you want.
beautiful
seems okay as long as they have a realistic definition of "harass," which is unlikely. y u do dat 2 mi? != harassment. also, how do you "harass to a moderator"? i don't like how mods can post shit like what aurik posted in here (and possibly other places before whoever went shit nuts with the post and thread removal) basically calling you a little bitch and asking what the fuck you're gonna do about it, and there's really no public slap on the wrist or anything for it. those people need to be turned out in public, because looking like they got the last word and accomplished whatever stupid bullshit it was they were trying to pull a) infuriates a lot of people and b) doesn't exactly discourage them from pulling dumb stunts in the future.
in fact, i don't really see a reason that when posts are deleted, locked, or moved, that the mod shouldn't have to explain the reason it was done. when posts are edited a note is always made like "did you have permission to post this information?" and we all understand why it was done/why it was necessary. locking/moving/deletion many times affects more than the initial poster(s) and actually having to go through that step might encourage the shit tier mods to only step in when necessary just because they don't want to deal with the hassle.
better to piss off one person on your staff who is doing a terrible job than piss off a handful of contributors because people with special status have special rules and don't get their shit locked/moved in an embarrassing fashion like the rest of us. i'm sure there are some people willing to step up and be a decent-to-good mod in place of those who seem to keep coming up in discussion because they abuse it.
He gives liking catgirls a bad name
KITTY PAAAWS