um, if you blew the cows head off, Id be just as pissed as a FYI.
um, if you blew the cows head off, Id be just as pissed as a FYI.
At least that guy looks like he has downs syndrome. God must have known he was going to do this and punished him ahead of time.
The difference is that these are livestock, which means that by law they are supposed to be slaughtered in as humane a way as possible without costing too much.(this is why when you see peta members go under cover and discover pigs being strangled with a chain as they are pulled up by a forklift slowly that these companies can be taken to court for animal abuse and have the death of the animals reviewed by veterinarians to determine whether or not animal cruelty actual took place) A cat is not livestock, it is not eaten by me you or 90% of the members of this board that is why we are able to look upon this topic with disdain. I am opposed to this because it was an innocent animal probably someones pet, it was not killed for sustenance it was killed for entertainment purposes which should be viewed negatively by everyone that posts here. The argument is not the difference between killing a cat and killing a cow the difference is between killing something meant to become food and killing something that you are going to leave as a bloody charred corpse on the sidewalk for some family to stumble upon wondering what happened to a pet that they see as being a part of their family.
The posts that you make as of late are so asinine and worthless created for the sole point of being argumentative that i can't imagine why anyone even bothers to read a single word you say including me.
Edit: also i have worked on a farm, i can understand being fond of pigs/cows and whatnot but chickens are retarded and the easiest animal to be okay with slaughtering as they are stupidest living things i have EVER come into contact with, even a 2 month year old baby is more self aware.
Was it a terrorist cat?
[wall-o-text]
I'm not going to argue if blowing up a cat is more or less 'evil' than hitting a cow with a pnematic hammer because everyon's oppinion is different and its pointless to argue, but I do think that the laws pertaining to animal cruelty are pretty half assed.
One man sees a cat as a family member worthy of love; to another man, that cat is explosive materials. Majority of people like pets, so we place laws against harming animals that commonly use as pets.
One man sees a cow as a deliscious treat; to another man, the cow is a fellow animal worthy of being treated as we would like to be treated ourselves. Majority of people like to eat tasty things not commonly used as pets, so eatting meat is legal.
One man sees a fly as a pest so he swats it to death; to another man, all life is precious (they're are vegans who only eat fruit/nuts that naturally fall to the ground after the plant 'willingly' gives it up in an attempt to not harm any organism but still have something to eat). Majority doesn't like bugs in their tato salad so we can all kill insects freely, hell theres about 10 pages in any given phone book of exterminators.
Whats the difference in killing a cat or a cow or a fly? Either way you've decided that you're better off with that thing dead. Who gives a fuck? It's perfectly fine for every to have their own ethics to follow for what's ok to kill and what's not ok to kill. I for one cut out poultry and cattle and pretty much stick to eatting sea critters. Either make killing anything in the animal kingdom completely illegal or get rid of all crimal charges for killing anything that's not a human. If you wrongfully kill an animal that's property of someone else then by all means bring it to civil court. But criminal charges for killing anything non-human is a waste of everyone's time and taxes.
lol, super hippie/upity for my first post but whatev
[/wall-o-text]
How can I continue..? No one has even answered the question yet.
Unless you mean something that I am not understanding!? Hmmm.