Judicial Review. Which is exactly the reason the Supreme Court gave when they ruled against James Madison in 1803.
Sometimes it's just too easy.
Judicial Review. Which is exactly the reason the Supreme Court gave when they ruled against James Madison in 1803.
Sometimes it's just too easy.
a lot of people did, but unfortunately a lot of people didn't. welcome to democracy; can't blame big gumment for everything- a lot of things, but not everything.
I'll blame occupational orphanage and Schools. Public Education clearly isn't doing its job. (Sup Rhinox, I'm talking about you).
I'd say the majority were against it for quite some time. How else did McCain get slaughtered? Didn't change anything, he still rammed us into the ground for 4 moar years. We still dealt with bush for another 4 years as he made some pretty fucked up decisions against the peoples best intrests and rights(Patriot Act / Spending / War says sup).
Maybe once upon a time your politicians actually represented you and care about you beyond getting your vote. The few honest politicians are the minority. Glad the Republic is doing its job.
If JM said, "by general welfaire I meant X" and the court reviews it, it's suddenly open to interpretation? The act of reviewing something does make something open to interpretation. Now if JM didn't say that at all, then yes it would be open to manipulation by liberals.